Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22621779›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2012

Surgical site infections following colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized prospective trial comparing common and advanced antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver.

Roberto Biffi, Luca Fattori, Emilio Bertani, Davide Radice, Nicole Rotmensz, Pasquale Misitano, Sabine Cenciarelli, Antonio Chiappa, Liliana Tadini, Marina Mancini and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00981110 phase3completednot on this map

Surgical Sites Infections Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery. A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Standard and Advanced Antimicrobial Dressing Containing Ionic Silver.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2008 to 2010Enrolled120ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsAQUAGEL Ag Hydrofiber Wound Dressing, Mepore Self-adhesive absorbent dressing
NCT03136159 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Adherent Occlusive Antimicrobial Absorbent Foam Dressing in Prevention of Cesarean Section Wound Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoyola UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled380ConditionsCesarean Section, Complications, Wound, DehiscenceArmsSilver-impregnated antimicrobial dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. A Randomized Trial of Ionic Silver Dressing to Reduce Surgical Site Infection After Gastrointestinal Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Silver in Wound Care-Friend or Foe?: A Comprehensive Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Roberto BiffiDivision of Abdomino-Pelvic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Via G, Ripamonti, Milan, 435-20141, Italy. roberto.biffi@ieo.it
Luca Fattori
Emilio Bertani
Davide Radice
Nicole Rotmensz
Pasquale Misitano
Sabine Cenciarelli
Antonio Chiappa
Liliana Tadini
Marina Mancini
Giovanni Pesenti
Bruno Andreoni
Angelo Nespoli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver was found effective in reducing surgical-site infection in a preliminary study of colorectal cancer elective surgery. We decided to test this finding in a randomized, double-blind trial.

methodsAdults undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery at two university-affiliated hospitals were randomly assigned to have the surgical incision dressed with Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing or a common dressing. To blind the patient and the nursing and medical staff to the nature of the dressing used, scrub nurses covered Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber with a common wound dressing in the experimental arm, whereas a double common dressing was applied to patients of control group. The primary end-point of the study was the occurrence of any surgical-site infection within 30 days of surgery.

resultsA total of 112 patients (58 in the experimental arm and 54 in the control group) qualified for primary end-point analysis. The characteristics of the patient population and their surgical procedures were similar. The overall rate of surgical-site infection was lower in the experimental group (11.1% center 1, 17.5% center 2; overall 15.5%) than in controls (14.3% center 1, 24.2% center 2, overall 20.4%), but the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.451), even with respect to surgical-site infection grade 1 (superficial) versus grades 2 and 3, or grade 1 and 2 versus grade 3.

conclusionsThis randomized trial did not confirm a statistically significant superiority of Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing in reducing surgical-site infection after elective colorectal cancer surgery.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT00981110.

Indexed as

BandagesAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumColorectal NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodDrug CarriersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisAnti-Infective AgentsCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumDrug CarriersSilversilverlon

Identifiers

PMID22621779
PMCPMC3407006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.