Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22621237›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

Learning sparse representations for fruit-fly gene expression pattern image annotation and retrieval.

Lei Yuan, Alexander Woodard, Shuiwang Ji, Yuan Jiang, Zhi-Hua Zhou, Sudhir Kumar, Jieping Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GINI: from ISH images to gene interaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2013
    Article
  6. Sparse Methods for Biomedical Data.SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lei YuanCenter for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Alexander Woodard
Shuiwang Ji
Yuan Jiang
Zhi-Hua Zhou
Sudhir Kumar
Jieping Ye

Funding

Computatonal Analysis of Gene Expression Pattern ImagesR01HG002516 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR · 2003 to 2013
$5.3M
Computational Methods for Expression Image AnalysisR01LM010730 · NLM · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR, YE, JIEPING · 2011 to 2013
$934k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002516NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002516NLM NIH HHS LM010730NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFruit fly embryogenesis is one of the best understood animal development systems, and the spatiotemporal gene expression dynamics in this process are captured by digital images. Analysis of these high-throughput images will provide novel insights into the functions, interactions, and networks of animal genes governing development. To facilitate comparative analysis, web-based interfaces have been developed to conduct image retrieval based on body part keywords and images. Currently, the keyword annotation of spatiotemporal gene expression patterns is conducted manually. However, this manual practice does not scale with the continuously expanding collection of images. In addition, existing image retrieval systems based on the expression patterns may be made more accurate using keywords.

resultsIn this article, we adapt advanced data mining and computer vision techniques to address the key challenges in annotating and retrieving fruit fly gene expression pattern images. To boost the performance of image annotation and retrieval, we propose representations integrating spatial information and sparse features, overcoming the limitations of prior schemes.

conclusionsWe perform systematic experimental studies to evaluate the proposed schemes in comparison with current methods. Experimental results indicate that the integration of spatial information and sparse features lead to consistent performance improvement in image annotation, while for the task of retrieval, sparse features alone yields better results.

Indexed as

Molecular Sequence AnnotationPattern Recognition, AutomatedSoftwareAnimalsDatabases, FactualData MiningDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingInternetSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID22621237
PMCPMC3434040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.