ArticleNephron extra2012
Hemodiafiltration improves plasma 25-hepcidin levels: a prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over study comparing hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.
Article in Nephron extra, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Mixed hemodiafiltration reduces erythropoiesis stimulating agents requirement in dialysis patients: a prospective randomized study.Journal of nephrology · 2020Trial
- Online hemodiafilteration use in children: a single center experience with a twist.BMC nephrology · 2020Trial
- Association between serum hepcidin-25 levels and hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in Japanese patients receiving hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Observational
- The Impact of Hemodiafiltration Versus Hemodialysis on Uremic Symptoms, Physical Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Why High-Volume Post-Dilution Hemodiafiltration Should Be the New Standard in Dialysis Care: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Outcomes and Mechanisms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Hemoincompatibility in Hemodialysis-Related Therapies and Their Health Economic Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- How biocompatible haemodialysers can conquer the need for systemic anticoagulation even in post-dilution haemodiafiltration: a cross-over study.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Article
- Biomarkers of iron metabolism in chronic kidney disease.International urology and nephrology · 2021Review
- Quality of Life and Hemodynamic Effects of Switching From Hemodialysis to Hemodiafiltration: A Canadian Controlled Cohort Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- The Influence of Inflammation on Anemia in CKD Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Iron and Chronic Kidney Disease: Still a Challenge.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- Effects of high-volume online mixed-hemodiafiltration on anemia management in dialysis patients.PloS one · 2019Article
- Variation of clinical and laboratory features in chronic dialysis patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis after switching to online hemodiafiltration.International urology and nephrology · 2013Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsData from studies comparing the effect of hemodiafiltration (HDF) and conventional hemodialysis (HD) on clinically important outcomes are insufficient to support superiority of HDF. None of these studies has been participant-blinded.
methodsWe performed a prospective, randomized, and patient-blinded cross-over study. Twenty patients on chronic HD received either HD for 2 months followed by post-dilution HDF for 2 months or in opposite order. A range of clinical parameters, as well as markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and iron metabolism was measured.
resultsThe two treatments were similar with respect to dialysis-related complications, quality of life, and the biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation. Compared to HD, 25-hepcidin and β(2)-microglobulin were 38 and 32%, respectively, lower after 60 days of HDF (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). The consumption of ESA (erythropoietin-stimulating agent) and LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin) was significantly higher with HDF.
conclusionIn short term, HDF is not superior to HD regarding dialysis-related complications. The higher ESA consumption observed with HDF can be explained by blood clotting in tubing and dialyzers, as more anticoagulation was needed with post-dilution HDF. In a longer perspective, lowering serum hepcidin levels may improve pathological iron homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.