Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22619265›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

Clinical influences on antibiotic prescribing decisions for lower respiratory tract infection: a nine country qualitative study of variation in care.

Lucy Brookes-Howell, Kerenza Hood, Lucy Cooper, Samuel Coenen, Paul Little, Theo Verheij, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Hasse Melbye, Jaroslaw Krawczyk, Alicia Borras-Santos and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: an updated and expanded meta-ethnography.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Clinical presentation and microbiological diagnosis in paediatric respiratory tract infection: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. C-reactive protein-guided antibiotic prescribing for COPD exacerbations: a qualitative evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Trial
  6. Amoxicillin for acute lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: subgroup analysis of potential high-risk groups.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lucy Brookes-HowellSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Kerenza Hood
Lucy Cooper
Samuel Coenen
Paul Little
Theo Verheij
Maciek Godycki-Cwirko
Hasse Melbye
Jaroslaw Krawczyk
Alicia Borras-Santos
Kristin Jakobsen
Patricia Worby
Herman Goossens
Christopher C Butler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is variation in antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in primary care that does not benefit patients. This study aims to investigate clinicians' accounts of clinical influences on antibiotic prescribing decisions for LRTI to better understand variation and identify opportunities for improvement.

designMulti country qualitative interview study. Semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions and a patient scenario. Data were subjected to five-stage analytic framework approach (familiarisation, developing a thematic framework from the interview questions and emerging themes, indexing, charting and mapping to search for interpretations), with interviewers commenting on preliminary reports.

settingPrimary care.

participants80 primary care clinicians randomly selected from primary care research networks based in nine European cities.

resultsClinicians reported four main individual clinical factors that guided their antibiotic prescribing decision: auscultation, fever, discoloured sputum and breathlessness. These were considered alongside a general impression of the patient derived from building a picture of the illness course, using intuition and familiarity with the patient. Comorbidity and older age were considered main risk factors for poor outcomes. Clinical factors were similar across networks, apart from C reactive protein near patient testing in Tromsø. Clinicians developed ways to handle diagnostic and management uncertainty through their own clinical routines.

conclusionsClinicians emphasised the importance of auscultation, fever, discoloured sputum and breathlessness, general impression of the illness course, familiarity with the patient, comorbidity, and age in informing their antibiotic prescribing decisions for LRTI. As some of these factors may be overemphasised given the evolving evidence base, greater standardisation of assessment and integration of findings may help reduce unhelpful variation in management. Non-clinical influences will also need to be addressed.

Identifiers

PMID22619265
PMCPMC3364454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.