Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22617489›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2013

Computational modeling of epilepsy for an experimental neurologist.

Abbey B Holt, Theoden I Netoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Antiepileptic drugs induce subcritical dynamics in human cortical networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bistable Firing Pattern in a Neural Network Model.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Seizure prediction - ready for a new era.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Control of Absence Seizures by the Thalamic Feed-Forward Inhibition.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Future of seizure prediction and intervention: closing the loop.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abbey B HoltDept. of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Theoden I Netoff

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING OF NEUROSCIENTISTST32GM008471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY J · 1993 to 2017
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling can be a powerful tool for an experimentalist, providing a rigorous mathematical model of the system you are studying. This can be valuable in testing your hypotheses and developing experimental protocols prior to experimenting. This paper reviews models of seizures and epilepsy at different scales, including cellular, network, cortical region, and brain scales by looking at how they have been used in conjunction with experimental data. At each scale, models with different levels of abstraction, the extraction of physiological detail, are presented. Varying levels of detail are necessary in different situations. Physiologically realistic models are valuable surrogates for experimental systems because, unlike in an experiment, every parameter can be changed and every variable can be observed. Abstract models are useful in determining essential parameters of a system, allowing the experimentalist to extract principles that explain the relationship between mechanisms and the behavior of the system. Modeling is becoming easier with the emergence of platforms dedicated to neuronal modeling and databases of models that can be downloaded. Modeling will never be a replacement for animal and clinical experiments, but it should be a starting point in designing experiments and understanding their results.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEpilepsyModels, BiologicalAnimalsBrainHumans

Identifiers

PMID22617489
PMCPMC3769176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.