Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22617130›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2012

Phase II multi-institutional prospective randomised trial comparing S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer.

E Mochiki, K Ogata, T Ohno, Y Toyomasu, N Haga, Y Fukai, R Aihara, H Ando, N Uchida, T Asao and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02163291 (Phase II Study of Paclitaxel Liposome Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02163291 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Study of Paclitaxel Liposome Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking UniversityRan2013 to 2014Enrolled30ConditionsAdvanced Gastric CarcinomaArmspaclitaxel liposome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Taxanes in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

E MochikiDepartment of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan. emochiki@gunma-u.ac.jp
K Ogata
T Ohno
Y Toyomasu
N Haga
Y Fukai
R Aihara
H Ando
N Uchida
T Asao
H Kuwano
North Kanto Gastric Cancer Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA combination of S-1 and cisplatin has been shown to be effective with acceptable safety for the first-line treatment of far-advanced gastric cancer in Japan. This is the first randomised phase II trial to compare S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in this setting.

methodsPatients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of the two regimens: S-1 (40 mg m(-2) twice daily) on days 1-14 plus paclitaxel (60 mg m(-2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (S-1+paclitaxel) or S-1 (40 mg m(-2) twice daily) on days 1-21 plus cisplatin (60 mg m(-2)) on day 8 of a 5-week cycle (S-1+cisplatin). The primary end point was the response rate (RR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

resultsA total of 83 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses. In the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups, RRs (52.3% vs 48.7%; P=0.74) and median PFS (9 vs 6 months; P=0.50) were similar. The median OS was similar in the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups (16 vs 17 months; P=0.84). The incidence of grade 3 or higher haematological toxicity was 19.0% with S-1+paclitaxel and 19.5% with S-1+cisplatin. The incidence of grade 3 or higher non-haematological toxicity was 14.2% with S-1+paclitaxel and 17.1% with S-1+cisplatin.

conclusionS-1+paclitaxel was suggested to be a feasible and effective non-platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Our results should be confirmed in multicenter, phase III-controlled clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxonic AcidPaclitaxelStomach NeoplasmsTegafurCisplatinDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidPaclitaxelS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

PMID22617130
PMCPMC3389419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.