Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22616742›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2012

PCR-hybridization after sonication improves diagnosis of implant-related infection.

Jaime Esteban, Noelia Alonso-Rodriguez, Gema del-Prado, Alberto Ortiz-Pérez, Diana Molina-Manso, Jose Cordero-Ampuero, Enrique Sandoval, Ricardo Fernández-Roblas, Enrique Gómez-Barrena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. PCR-based diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Disinfection of contaminated metal implants with an Er:YAG laser.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaime EstebanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain. jestebanmoreno@gmail.com
Noelia Alonso-Rodriguez
Gema del-Prado
Alberto Ortiz-Pérez
Diana Molina-Manso
Jose Cordero-Ampuero
Enrique Sandoval
Ricardo Fernández-Roblas
Enrique Gómez-Barrena
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe wanted to improve the diagnosis of implant-related infection using molecular biological techniques after sonication.

methodsWe studied 258 retrieved implant components (185 prosthetic implants and 73 osteosynthesis implants) from 126 patients. 47 patients had a clinical diagnosis of infection (108 components) and 79 patients did not (150 components). The fluids from sonication of retrieved implants were tested in culture and were also analyzed using a modified commercial PCR kit for detection of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (GenoType BC; Hain Lifescience) after extraction of the DNA.

results38 of 47 patients with a clinical diagnosis of infection were also diagnosed as being infected using culture and/or PCR (35 by culture alone). Also, 24 patients of the 79 cases with no clinical diagnosis of infection were identified microbiologically as being infected (4 by culture, 16 by PCR, and 4 by both culture and PCR). Comparing culture and PCR, positive culture results were obtained in 28 of the 79 patients and positive PCR results were obtained in 35. There were 21 discordant results in patients who were originally clinically diagnosed as being infected and 28 discordant results in patients who had no clinical diagnosis of infection.

interpretationFor prosthetic joint infections and relative to culture, molecular detection can increase (by one tenth) the number of patients diagnosed as having an infection. Positive results from patients who have no clinical diagnosis of infection must be interpreted carefully.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalProstheses and ImplantsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA ProbesGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionProsthesis-Related InfectionsSonicationSurgical Wound InfectionYoung AdultDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID22616742
PMCPMC3369159
OpenAlexW2015692453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.