ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2012
Fermentative hydrogen production from glucose and starch using pure strains and artificial co-cultures ofClostridium spp.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual variability in hydrogen-producing microbes influences the response to hydrogen supplementation on sleep quality: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Biological Routes for Biohydrogen Production: A Clean and Carbon-Free Fuel.Biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Endophytic Fungi Co-Culture: An Alternative Source of Antimicrobial Substances.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Microbiome associated to an HEnvironmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Application of microbial resources in biorefineries: Current trend and future prospects.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Thermoplastic Starch Composites Reinforced with Functionalized POSS: Fabrication, Characterization, and Evolution of Mechanical, Thermal and Biological Activities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Over-feeding the gut microbiome: A scoping review on health implications and therapeutic perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Zeolite addition to improve biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of C5/C6-sugars and Sargassum sp. biomass.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Bio-Hydrogen Production Using Landfill Leachate Considering Different Photo-Fermentation Processes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Molecular biohydrogen production by dark and photo fermentation from wastes containing starch: recent advancement and future perspective.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021Review
- Advances and Applications ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Intestinal gases: influence on gut disorders and the role of dietary manipulations.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Review
- Lignocellulosic hydrogen production using dark fermentation byRSC advances · 2019Article
- Metabolite-based mutualism enhances hydrogen production in a two-species microbial consortium.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Hydrogen production and microbial kinetics of Clostridium termitidis in mono-culture and co-culture with Clostridium beijerinckii on cellulose.AMB Express · 2017Article
- Fermentative hydrogen production from Jerusalem artichoke by Clostridium tyrobutyricum expressing exo-inulinase gene.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Inoculation of paperboard mill sludge versus mixed culture bacteria for hydrogen production from paperboard mill wastewater.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016Article
- Mini review: hydrogen and ethanol co-production from waste materials via microbial fermentation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2015Review
- Genome-wide transcriptional analysis suggests hydrogenase- and nitrogenase-mediated hydrogen production in Clostridium butyricum CWBI 1009.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2015Article
- Simultaneous hydrogen and ethanol production from cascade utilization of mono-substrate in integrated dark and photo-fermentative reactor.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPure bacterial strains give better yields when producing H2 than mixed, natural communities. However the main drawback with the pure cultures is the need to perform the fermentations under sterile conditions. Therefore, H2 production using artificial co-cultures, composed of well characterized strains, is one of the directions currently undertaken in the field of biohydrogen research.
resultsFour pure Clostridium cultures, including C. butyricum CWBI1009, C. pasteurianum DSM525, C. beijerinckii DSM1820 and C. felsineum DSM749, and three different co-cultures composed of (1) C. pasteurianum and C. felsineum, (2) C. butyricum and C. felsineum, (3) C. butyricum and C. pasteurianum, were grown in 20 L batch bioreactors. In the first part of the study a strategy composed of three-culture sequences was developed to determine the optimal pH for H2 production (sequence 1); and the H2-producing potential of each pure strain and co-culture, during glucose (sequence 2) and starch (sequence 3) fermentations at the optimal pH. The best H2 yields were obtained for starch fermentations, and the highest yield of 2.91 mol H2/ mol hexose was reported for C. butyricum. By contrast, the biogas production rates were higher for glucose fermentations and the highest value of 1.5 L biogas/ h was observed for the co-culture (1). In general co-cultures produced H2 at higher rates than the pure Clostridium cultures, without negatively affecting the H2 yields. Interestingly, all the Clostridium strains and co-cultures were shown to utilize lactate (present in a starch-containing medium), and C. beijerinckii was able to re-consume formate producing additional H2. In the second part of the study the co-culture (3) was used to produce H2 during 13 days of glucose fermentation in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). In addition, the species dynamics, as monitored by qPCR (quantitative real-time PCR), showed a stable coexistence of C. pasteurianum and C. butyricum during this fermentation.
conclusionsThe four pure Clostridium strains and the artificial co-cultures tested in this study were shown to efficiently produce H2 using glucose and starch as carbon sources. The artificial co-cultures produced H2 at higher rates than the pure strains, while the H2 yields were only slightly affected.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.