ArticlePloS one2012
Does the precision of a biological clock depend upon its period? Effects of the duper and tau mutations in Syrian hamsters.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circadian Responses to Light in the BTBR Mouse.Journal of biological rhythms · 2022Article
- The duper mutation reveals previously unsuspected functions ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Article
- Heritable gene expression variability and stochasticity govern clonal heterogeneity in circadian period.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Circadian Function in Multiple Cell Types Is Necessary for Proper Timing of the Preovulatory LH Surge.Journal of biological rhythms · 2019Article
- Suprachiasmatic function in a circadian period mutant: Duper alters light-induced activation of vasoactive intestinal peptide cells and PERIOD1 immunostaining.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Article
- Phase resetting in duper hamsters: specificity to photic zeitgebers and circadian phase.Journal of biological rhythms · 2015Article
- Selection for narrow gate of emergence results in correlated sex-specific changes in life history of Drosophila melanogaster.Biology open · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations which alter the feedback loops that generate circadian rhythms may provide insight into their insensitivity to perturbation robustness) and their consistency of period (precision). I examined relationships between endogenous period, activity and rest (τ(DD), α and ρ) in Syrian hamsters using two different mutations, duper and tau, both of which speed up the circadian clock. I generated 8 strains of hamsters that are homozygous or heterozygous for the tau, duper, and wild type alleles in all combinations. The endogenous period of activity onsets among these strains ranged from 17.94+0.04 to 24.13 ± 0.04 h. Contrary to predictions, the variability of period was unrelated to its absolute value: all strains showed similar variability of τ(DD) when activity onsets and acrophase were used as phase markers. The τ(DD) of activity offsets was more variable than onsets but also differed little between genotypes. Cycle variation and precision were not correlated with τ(DD) within any strain, and only weakly correlated when all strains are considered together. Only in animals homozygous for both mutations (super duper hamsters) were cycle variation and precision reduced. Rhythm amplitude differed between strains and was positively correlated with τ(DD) and precision. All genotypes showed negative correlations between α and ρ. This confirms the expectation that deviations in the duration of subjective day and night should offset one another in order to conserve circadian period, even though homeostatic maintenance of energy reserves predicts that longer intervals of activity or rest would be followed by longer durations of rest or activity. Females consistently showed greater variability of the period of activity onset and acrophase, and of α, but variability of the period of offset differed between sexes only in super duper hamsters. Despite the differences between genotypes in τ(DD), ρ was consistently more strongly correlated with the preceding than the succeeding α.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.