ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2012
The effects of magnetite (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles on electroporation-induced inward currents in pituitary tumor (GH₃) cells and in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of bioengineered SPIONs usingOpen life sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Small-Molecule Candidates as Modulators of M-Type KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Functionalized SPION immobilized on graphene-oxide: Anticancer and antiviral study.Diamond and related materials · 2022Article
- Article
- Evidence for the Effectiveness of Remdesivir (GS-5734), a Nucleoside-Analog Antiviral Drug in the Inhibition ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The Effect of Millisecond Pulsed Electric Fields (msPEF) on Intracellular Drug Transport with Negatively Charged Large Nanocarriers Made of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLN): In Vitro Study.The Journal of membrane biology · 2016Article
- Chemical and magnetic functionalization of graphene oxide as a route to enhance its biocompatibility.Nanoscale research letters · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsFe₃O₄ nanoparticles (NPs) have been known to provide a distinct image contrast effect for magnetic resonance imaging owing to their super paramagnetic properties on local magnetic fields. However, the possible effects of these NPs on membrane ion currents that concurrently induce local magnetic field perturbation remain unclear.
methodsWe evaluated whether amine surface-modified Fe₃O₄ NPs have any effect on ion currents in pituitary tumor (GH₃) cells via voltage clamp methods.
resultsThe addition of Fe₃O₄ NPs decreases the amplitude of membrane electroporation-induced currents (I(MEP)) with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration at 45 μg/mL. Fe₃O₄ NPs at a concentration of 3 mg/mL produced a biphasic response in the amplitude of I(MEP), ie, an initial decrease followed by a sustained increase. A similar effect was also noted in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
conclusionThe modulation of magnetic electroporation-induced currents by Fe₃O₄ NPs constitutes an important approach for cell tracking under various imaging modalities or facilitated drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.