Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22615413›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Model for MLL translocations in therapy-related leukemia involving topoisomerase IIβ-mediated DNA strand breaks and gene proximity.

Ian G Cowell, Zbyslaw Sondka, Kayleigh Smith, Ka Cheong Lee, Catriona M Manville, Malgorzata Sidorczuk-Lesthuruge, Holly Ashlene Rance, Kay Padget, Graham Hunter Jackson, Noritaka Adachi and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. PDS5A and TOP2B cooperate for chromatin recruitment via CTCF.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toward a Unified Theory of Why Young People Develop Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Highly sensitive mapping ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Use of CRISPR/Cas9 with Homology-Directed Repair to Gene-Edit Topoisomerase IIThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA fragility at theOpen biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ian G CowellInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Zbyslaw Sondka
Kayleigh Smith
Ka Cheong Lee
Catriona M Manville
Malgorzata Sidorczuk-Lesthuruge
Holly Ashlene Rance
Kay Padget
Graham Hunter Jackson
Noritaka Adachi
Caroline A Austin
Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FRNewcastle University · GBApplied Sciences (United States) · USYokohama City University · JP

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E528460/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G529383/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topoisomerase poisons such as the epipodophyllotoxin etoposide are widely used effective cytotoxic anticancer agents. However, they are associated with the development of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemias (t-AMLs), which display characteristic balanced chromosome translocations, most often involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) locus at 11q23. MLL translocation breakpoints in t-AMLs cluster in a DNase I hypersensitive region, which possesses cryptic promoter activity, implicating transcription as well as topoisomerase II activity in the translocation mechanism. We find that 2-3% of MLL alleles undergoing transcription do so in close proximity to one of its recurrent translocation partner genes, AF9 or AF4, consistent with their sharing transcription factories. We show that most etoposide-induced chromosome breaks in the MLL locus and the overall genotoxicity of etoposide are dependent on topoisomerase IIβ, but that topoisomerase IIα and -β occupancy and etoposide-induced DNA cleavage data suggest factors other than local topoisomerase II concentration determine specific clustering of MLL translocation breakpoints in t-AML. We propose a model where DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced by topoisomerase IIβ into pairs of genes undergoing transcription within a common transcription factory become stabilized by antitopoisomerase II drugs such as etoposide, providing the opportunity for illegitimate end joining and translocation.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedModels, BiologicalChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEtoposideFluorescenceHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMicronucleus TestsMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinNeoplasms, Second PrimaryTranslocation, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEtoposideMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein

Identifiers

PMID22615413
PMCPMC3384169
OpenAlexW2047039095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.