Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22614769›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2012

Childhood cancer incidence trends in association with US folic acid fortification (1986-2008).

Amy M Linabery, Kimberly J Johnson, Julie A Ross

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Folic acid: friend or foe in cancer therapy.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fetal programming and Wilms tumor.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2019
    Article
  17. Folic acid, one-carbon metabolism & childhood cancer.The Indian journal of medical research · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy M LinaberyDivision of Pediatric Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. linabery@umn.edu
Kimberly J Johnson
Julie A Ross
University of Minnesota · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Translational Pediatric Cancer Epidemiology Research Training GrantT32CA099936 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Logan G. Spector · 2004 to 2026
$5.1M
Established Investigator Award in Pediatric Cancer EpidemiologyK05CA157439 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ROSS, JULIE ANN · 2011 to 2015
$695k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA157439NCI NIH HHS T32 CA099936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpidemiologic evidence indicates that prenatal vitamin supplementation reduces risk for some childhood cancers; however, a systematic evaluation of population-based childhood cancer incidence trends after fortification of enriched grain products with folic acid in the United States in 1996-1998 has not been previously reported. Here we describe temporal trends in childhood cancer incidence in association with US folic acid fortification.

methodsUsing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data (1986-2008), we calculated incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to compare pre- and postfortification cancer incidence rates in children aged 0 to 4 years. Incidence trends were also evaluated by using joinpoint and loess regression models.

resultsFrom 1986 through 2008, 8829 children aged 0 to 4 years were diagnosed with malignancies, including 3790 and 3299 in utero during the pre- and postfortification periods, respectively. Pre- and postfortification incidence rates were similar for all cancers combined and for most specific cancer types. Rates of Wilms tumor (WT), primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs), and ependymomas were significantly lower postfortification. Joinpoint regression models detected increasing WT incidence from 1986 through 1997 followed by a sizable decline from 1997 through 2008, and increasing PNET incidence from 1986 through 1993 followed by a sharp decrease from 1993 through 2008. Loess curves indicated similar patterns.

conclusionsThese results provide support for a decrease in WT and possibly PNET incidence, but not other childhood cancers, after US folic acid fortification.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedChild, PreschoolFemaleFolic AcidHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeoplasmsNutrition SurveysRegistriesUnited StatesFolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22614769
PMCPMC3362910
OpenAlexW2132331467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.