Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22614172›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

Discontinuation of statin therapy in older people: does a cancer diagnosis make a difference? An observational cohort study using data linkage.

Efty P Stavrou, Nicholas Buckley, Jake Olivier, Sallie-Anne Pearson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing potentially inappropriate medications in palliative cancer patients: evidence to support deprescribing approaches.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. The potential for deprescribing in a palliative oncology patient population: a cross-sectional study.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Article
  6. Statins and Cancer Prevention-Association Does Not Mean Causation.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patterns of statin initiation and continuation in patients with breast or colorectal cancer, towards end-of-life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Recommendations to support deprescribing medications late in life.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Statins and cancers.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2015
    Review
  17. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Efty P StavrouAdult Cancer Program, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas Buckley
Jake Olivier
Sallie-Anne Pearson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim was to examine statin discontinuation rates in a cohort of elderly Australians with newly diagnosed cancer using population-based secondary health data.

designObservational cohort study.

settingNew South Wales, the largest jurisdiction in Australia. The Pharmaceutical Benefits and Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Schemes are national programmes subsidising prescription drugs to the Australian population and Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs clients.

participantsThe cohort comprised 1731 cancer patients aged ≥65 years with evidence of statin use in the 90 days prior to diagnosis. They were matched to 3462 non-cancer patients prescribed statins in the same period.

main outcome measureThe authors compared statin discontinuation rates up to 4 years post-diagnosis and examined the factors associated with statin discontinuation.

resultsThe proportion of cancer patients discontinuing statin therapy at 4 years (27%) was comparable to the comparison cohort; however, significantly higher proportions of the cancer cohort discontinued statins than the comparison cohort at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up (9.7% vs 7.4% at 12 months, respectively). More than 30% of cancer patients who died were dispensed statins within 30 days of death. Discontinuation of statin therapy in cancer patients was associated with regionalised and distant disease spread at diagnosis (p<0.001), older age (p=0.006), upper gastrointestinal organs and liver cancer (aHR 2.95, 95% CI 1.92 to 4.53) and cancer of the lung, bronchus and trachea (aHR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.00) and poorer survival.

conclusionsMedications should be rationalised at the time of a cancer diagnosis, especially in the setting of a poor prognosis. At least for some patients in our cohort, statin therapy may be inappropriately continued which adds unnecessarily to therapeutic burden.

Identifiers

PMID22614172
PMCPMC3358623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.