Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22613305›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2012

Early symptoms of bone and soft tissue sarcomas: could they be diagnosed earlier?

A George, R Grimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. How Much Do Healthcare Practitioners Know About Sarcoma?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Defining Core Competencies for Generalists in Musculoskeletal Oncology: A Latin-American Consensus for Medical Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Assessing Sarcoma Awareness Among the General Population in Minnesota: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study from the Minnesota State Fair in 2015 and 2022.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluation of sarcopenia's relationship with overall survival and treatment toxicity in soft tissue sarcomas.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A GeorgeDepartment of Medicine, Medical School, University of Birmingham, UK. andrew.george@doctors.org.uk
R Grimer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelays in diagnosis are common for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma (STS) despite guidance produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. This study set out to identify early symptoms experienced by patients and reasons for delays in making a definitive diagnosis.

methodsRetrospective interviews were carried out with 107 patients (66 with an STS and 41 with a bone sarcoma) presenting to a specialist centre. Symptoms were determined prior to definitive diagnosis and the occurrence of patient and doctor delays in reaching specialist care.

resultsThe median patient delay was 1 month while the median doctor delay was 3.2 months from first symptoms to diagnosis for all sarcomas. Forty-nine patients with STS (74%) presented initially to their general practitioner with at least one guideline feature to prompt urgent referral. Only 2 patients (4%), however, were referred directly to a sarcoma unit, with 21 (43%) referred to secondary care for investigation. Patients with a lump increasing in size exhibited longer patient delays while doctor delay was shorter for deep lumps. Thirty-six patients with a bone sarcoma (88%) presented initially with symptoms to prompt further investigation. Nevertheless, significant delays (3.9 months) were seen in reaching specialist care. Only 4 patients (10%) were referred directly to a sarcoma unit at first presentation, with 21 (54%) referred for further investigation elsewhere.

conclusionsIt is evident that awareness and referral of sarcomas remain poor. We suggest specific amendments to current guidelines and clearer referral pathways for patients. Furthermore, the need for robust education strategies is indicated, predominantly among healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionBone NeoplasmsDelayed DiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSarcomaSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID22613305
PMCPMC3957506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.