Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22613192›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2012

Light-scattering sensor for real-time identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae colonies on solid agar plate.

Karleigh Huff, Amornrat Aroonnual, Amy E Fleishman Littlejohn, Bartek Rajwa, Euiwon Bae, Padmapriya P Banada, Valery Patsekin, E Daniel Hirleman, J Paul Robinson, Gary P Richards and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Petri-plate, bacteria, and laser optical scattering sensor.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Identification of colonies of cultured shellfish-associatedCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Colony Fingerprint-Based Discrimination ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karleigh HuffMolecular Food Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Amornrat Aroonnual
Amy E Fleishman Littlejohn
Bartek Rajwa
Euiwon Bae
Padmapriya P Banada
Valery Patsekin
E Daniel Hirleman
J Paul Robinson
Gary P Richards
Arun K Bhunia
Purdue University West Lafayette · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three most common pathogenic species of Vibrio, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus, are of major concerns due to increased incidence of water- and seafood-related outbreaks and illness worldwide. Current methods are lengthy and require biochemical and molecular confirmation. A novel label-free forward light-scattering sensor was developed to detect and identify colonies of these three pathogens in real time in the presence of other vibrios in food or water samples. Vibrio colonies grown on agar plates were illuminated by a 635 nm laser beam and scatter-image signatures were acquired using a CCD (charge-coupled device) camera in an automated BARDOT (BActerial Rapid Detection using Optical light-scattering Technology) system. Although a limited number of Vibrio species was tested, each produced a unique light-scattering signature that is consistent from colony to colony. Subsequently a pattern recognition system analysing the collected light-scatter information provided classification in 1-2 min with an accuracy of 99%. The light-scattering signatures were unaffected by subjecting the bacteria to physiological stressors: osmotic imbalance, acid, heat and recovery from a viable but non-culturable state. Furthermore, employing a standard sample enrichment in alkaline peptone water for 6 h followed by plating on selective thiosulphate citrate bile salts sucrose agar at 30°C for ∼ 12 h, the light-scattering sensor successfully detected V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus present in oyster or water samples in 18 h even in the presence of other vibrios or other bacteria, indicating the suitability of the sensor as a powerful screening tool for pathogens on agar plates.

Indexed as

AgarBacteriological TechniquesCulture MediaDNA, BacterialFood MicrobiologyLightMolecular Sequence DataSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNATime FactorsVibrio choleraeVibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio vulnificusWater MicrobiologyAgarCulture MediaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22613192
PMCPMC3815873
OpenAlexW1570826926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.