ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2012
High-throughput DNA methylation datasets for evaluating false discovery rate methodologies.
Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A theoretical model for detecting drug interaction with awareness of timing of exposure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Precision Mixture Risk Model to Identify Adverse Drug Events in Subpopulations Using a Case-Crossover Design.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Development of a Bile Acid-Related Gene Signature for Predicting Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Differential methylation pattern in patients with coronary artery disease: pilot study.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Unique Microbial Diversity and Metabolic Pathway Features of Fermented Vegetables From Hainan, China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Comparative study of the gut microbiome potentially related to milk protein in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and Chinese Holstein cattle.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Metagenomic approach reveals microbial diversity and predictive microbial metabolic pathways in Yucha, a traditional Li fermented food.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Transcriptional profiling of the host cell response to feline immunodeficiency virus infection.Virology journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When analyzing high-throughput genomic data, the multiple comparison problem is most often addressed through estimation of the false discovery rate (FDR), using methods such as the Benjamini & Hochberg, Benjamini & Yekutieli, the q-value method, or in controlling the family-wise error rate (FWER) using Holm's step down method. To date, research studies that have compared various FDR/FWER methodologies have made use of limited simulation studies and/or have applied the methods to one or more microarray gene expression dataset(s). However, for microarray datasets the veracity of each null hypothesis tested is unknown so that an objective evaluation of performance cannot be rendered for application data. Due to the role of methylation in X-chromosome inactivation, we postulate that high-throughput methylation datasets may provide an appropriate forum for assessing the performance of commonly used FDR methodologies. These datasets preserve the complex correlation structure between probes, offering an advantage over simulated datasets. Using several methylation datasets, commonly used FDR methods including the q-value, Benjamini & Hochberg, and Benjamini & Yekutieli procedures as well as Holm's step down method were applied to identify CpG sites that are differentially methylated when comparing healthy males to healthy females. The methods were compared with respect to their ability to identify CpG sites located on sex chromosomes as significant, by reporting the sensitivity, specificity, and observed FDR. These datasets are useful for characterizing the performance of multiple comparison procedures, and may find further utility in other tasks such as comparing variable selection capabilities of classification methods and evaluating the performance of meta-analytic methods for microarray data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.