Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22610948›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2012

Comparison of several attachment methods for human iPS, embryonic and adipose-derived stem cells for tissue engineering.

Mai T Lam, Michael T Longaker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Poking Pluripotency: Nanoinjection Into Human iPSCs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mai T LamHagey Pediatric Regenerative Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305–5148, USA.
Michael T Longaker
Stanford University · US

Funding

Induced pluripotent stem cells in the understanding and treatment of heart diseaseU01HL099776 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2015
$8.2M
Multi-Disciplinary Training Program in Cardiovascular Imaging at StanfordT32EB009035 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Koen Nieman, John M. Pauly · 2008 to 2026
$4.3M
Calvarial Regeneration using Biomatrix-Encapsulated Skeletal ProgenitorsRC2DE020771 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BARRON, ANNELISE EMILY, LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2009 to 2010
$2.1M
Osteogenic Enrichment of Adipose Derived Stromal CellsR01DE021683 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C, LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Regional differences in neural crest and mesodermal derived calvarial bone healinR01DE019434 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
Derivation of Porcine iPS Cells and iPS Cell-Derived CardiomyocytesRC1HL100490 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL100490NHLBI NIH HHS RC1HL100490-02NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099776NHLBI NIH HHS UO1HL099776-01NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009035NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019434NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021683NIDCR NIH HHS RC2 DE020771NIDCR NIH HHS RC2DE020771-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As actual stem cell application quickly approaches tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, aspects such as cell attachment to scaffolds and biomaterials become important and are often overlooked. Here, we compare the effects of several attachment proteins on the adhesion, proliferation and stem cell identity of three promising human stem cell types: human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs), human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Traditional tissue culture polystyrene plates (TCPS), Matrigel (Mat), laminin (Lam), fibronectin (FN) and poly-L-lysine (PLL) were investigated as attachment protein surfaces. For hASCs typically cultured on TCPS, laminin resulted in the greatest cell attachment and proliferation with largest cell areas, indicating favourability by cell spreading. However, mesenchymal stem cell markers indicative of hASCs were slightly more expressed on surfaces with lowest cell attachment, corresponding to increased cell roundness, a newly observed attribute in hASCs possibly indicating a more stem cell-like character. hESCs preferred Matrigel as a feeder-free culture surface. Interestingly, hiPSCs favoured laminin over Matrigel for colony expansion, shown by larger cell colony area and perimeter lengths, although cell numbers and stem cell marker expression level remained highest on Matrigel. These data provide a practical reference guide for selecting a suitable attachment method for using human induced pluripotent, embryonic or adipose stem cells in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionTissue EngineeringAdipose TissueEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID22610948
PMCPMC4086291
OpenAlexW1926498138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.