Doing what feels good (and avoiding what feels bad)--a growing recognition of the influence of affect on exercise behavior: a comment on Williams et al.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Rethinking physical activity communication: using focus groups to understand women's goals, values, and beliefs to improve public health.BMC public health · 2017
   Article
2. Using Smartphone Apps to Promote Psychiatric and Physical Well-Being.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2015
   Article
3. Exploring participant appreciation of group-based principles for action in community-based physical activity programs for socially vulnerable groups in the Netherlands.BMC public health · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10-min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity?2012

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as