ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2012
Sesame seed food allergy.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
High and Low Dose Oral Sesame Immunotherapy - Comparison of Efficacy and Safety
Induction of Sustained Unresponsiveness to Sesame Using High- and Low-dose Sesame Oral Immunotherapy - Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety
Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Sesame Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of the Acquisition of Sustained Unresponsiveness (SU) to Sesame Protein Following Low-dose Oral Immunotherapy - Long-term Follow-up of Patients From the RCT Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Sesame Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients, NCT06261554.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food safety issues associated with sesame seed value chains: Current status and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Article
- The Effectiveness of Oral Immunotherapy in Patients with Sesame Anaphylaxis using Omalizumab.Clinical medicine & research · 2022Article
- Food allergy safety: a descriptive report of changing policy in a single large medical center.Israel journal of health policy research · 2021Review
- Article
- The development of a standardised diet history tool to support the diagnosis of food allergy.Clinical and translational allergy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of reports regarding sesame seed food allergy (SFA) has increased significantly worldwide over the past two decades, either due to a genuine increase in SFA or merely an increase in its awareness. Its prevalence is difficult to estimate due to the lack of well designed prospective population-based studies. Based on the available data, we estimate that SFA affects 0.1-0.2 % of the population, in areas where the food is available. Albeit this prevalence appears to be relatively low, it is approximately one-half of that of persistent cow's milk allergy. While only one fatality has been reported, the significant number of SFA patients presenting as anaphylaxis indicates the potential risk. Many reports based the diagnosis of SFA on sensitization criteria alone, particularly amongst atopic dermatitis patients. Elimination of sesame from the diet of these children utilizing such criteria is not justified, and may even increase the risk for developing SFA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.