Trial reportPatient education and counseling2012
Decision preparation, satisfaction and regret in a multi-center sample of men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.
Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Pooled it
- Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.World journal of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- Decision regret, adverse outcomes, and treatment choice in men with localized prostate cancer: Results from a multi-site randomized trial.Urologic oncology · 2021Trial
- Head to head randomized trial of two decision aids for prostate cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Trial
- Decision Support with the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.The Journal of urology · 2018Trial
- Does a decision aid for prostate cancer affect different aspects of decisional regret, assessed with new regret scales? A randomized, controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Trial
- From Treatment to Recovery: Gynecological Survivors' and Caregivers' Perspectives About the Usability of an Educational Resource.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Anxiety and Depression in Metastatic Cancer: A Critical Review of Negative Impacts on Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Decision Making With Practical Recommendations.JCO oncology practice · 2023Review
- Article
- Patient-reported Satisfaction and Regret Following Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Assessing the Impact of Decision Aid Use on Post Prostatectomy Patient Reported Outcomes.Urology · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with Decision Aid Use in Localized Prostate Cancer.Urology practice · 2022Article
- Living With Urinary Diversions: Patient Insights to Improve the Perioperative Experience.Urology · 2021Observational
- Factors underlying treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer in the U.S. and Canada: A scoping review using principal component analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019Article
- A pilot evaluation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite for clinical practice (EPIC-CP) tool in Ontario.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Decision Support Systems in Prostate Cancer Treatment: An Overview.BioMed research international · 2019Review
- Understanding health decision making: An exploration of homophily.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe relationships between use of the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) decision support system and patient characteristics, and perceived preparation for decision making (PrepDM), satisfaction and decisional regret in the context of prostate cancer treatment choice.
methods494 men with localized prostate cancer (LPC) were randomized to receive the P3P intervention or usual care and completed pre-treatment, 1-month and 6-month outcome measures. Multivariable linear regression models were fit for each outcome.
resultsPhysician consult visits prior to enrollment, race/ethnicity, and use of clinic-provided books were significant predictors of perceived PrepDM at 1 month. Prior Internet use and PrepDM significantly predicted 6-month decision satisfaction. Decisional regret was significantly predicted by demographics, anxiety, PrepDM score, and EPIC bowel domain score at 6 months. Use of P3P did not predict any outcome.
conclusionWhile the P3P intervention did not significantly affect the outcomes, pre-enrollment information and preparation were strong predictors of the 1- and 6-month outcomes. Decision regret was significantly influenced by personal characteristics and post-treatment symptoms/side effects. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Information received and used between biopsy and the treatment options consult visit is likely to make a difference in decision satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.