ArticleAtencion primaria2012
[Evolution of burnout and associated factors in primary care physicians].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mindfulness in primary care healthcare and teaching professionals and its relationship with stress at work: a multicentric cross-sectional study.BMC family practice · 2021Trial
- [Association between burnout and quality of care in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2025Observational
- Article
- Burnout in French General Practitioners: A Nationwide Prospective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Burnout among primary health care workers in Brazil: results of a multilevel analysis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021Article
- Occupational stress and burnout among physiotherapists: a cross-sectional survey in Cadiz (Spain).Human resources for health · 2020Observational
- Effectiveness of a multimodal training programme to improve general practitioners' burnout, job satisfaction and psychological well-being.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Article
- [Burnout and associated factors in primary care physicians].Atencion primaria · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyse the course of burnout and develop an explanatory model.
designProspective cohort dynamics. SITE: All primary health care centres in Burgos. SUBJECTS: All physicians except medical emergencies, paediatrics and residents. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Anonymous self-report questionnaire: Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and related variables. An analysis was performed using the Student-t, X(2) test and logistic regression.
resultsThe response rate was 47.76% in 2007, which was lower than that of 2005. There were significant differences between 2005 and 2007, for increases in the percentage of physicians who smoked, postgraduate training, residency, and those who believe that coordination with nursing and specialist care and institutional communication is appropriate. There was an increase in the prevalence of burnout by almost one point compared with 2005, a decrease in maximum burnout and emotional exhaustion (EC), and an increase in depersonalisation (DP) and personal accomplishment (RP). The incidence density of burnout was 1/113. 5 primary care physicians per year. The existence of burnout is associated with the use of chronic medication and inadequate coordination between nursing and EC, and also with the high workload.
conclusionsThe increase in the prevalence found is consistent with the idea of burnout as a dynamic development and the theoretical model described. Stable and quality employment is one way to indirectly mitigate (by encouraging internal communication) professional burnout. In the multivariate analysis, the most critical variable in the onset of burnout is the inadequate coordination with nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.