ArticleImplementation science : IS2012
Improving quality of care through improved audit and feedback.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04356274 (Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Effect of enhancing audit and feedback on uptake of childhood pneumonia treatment policy in hospitals that are part of a clinical network: a cluster randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2019Trial
- Barriers to Population Data Use in Overdose Fatality Reviews: Observational and Interview Study of Dashboard Deployment.JMIR human factors · 2026Observational
- Beyond Compliance: Understanding the Role of Peer Review Through a Theory of Change.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Primary Care by Telehealth and Care Quality in the Veterans Health Administration.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Health worker training and day-1 feeding prescriptions for very low birth weight neonates: an interrupted time series study in two Kenyan hospitals.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Evaluating organisational performance in healthcare: a mixed-method study using the McKinsey 7S framework.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Implementing a Rapid Improvement Event with anonymised individual performance reporting on benign hysterectomy care: a retrospective comparative analysis.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Article
- Deploying an asthma dashboard to support quality improvement across a nationally representative sentinel network of 7.6 million people in England.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Summary of Veterans Health Administration Cancer Data Sources.Journal of registry management · 2024Article
- Study protocol: maintaining preventive care during public health emergencies through effective coordination.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Using audit and feedback to guide tailored implementations of measurement-based care in community mental health: a multiple case study.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Audit and Feedback in the Hospitals of the Emergency Networks in the Lazio Region, Italy: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the State of Implementation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Development and evaluation of the accuracy of an indicator of the appropriateness of interventional cardiology generated from a French registry.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
- Making the most of audit and feedback to improve diabetes care: a qualitative study of the perspectives of Australian Diabetes Centres.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of video-based coaching to enhance clinicians' communication skills with patients.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Individual-Level Factors are Significantly More Predictive of Employee Innovativeness Than Job-Specific or Organization-Level Factors: Results From a Quantitative Study of Health Professionals.Health services insights · 2022Article
- Implementation of a New Hampshire community-initiated response to the opioid crisis: A mixed-methods process evaluation of Safe Station.The International journal on drug policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has led the industry in measuring facility performance as a critical element in improving quality of care, investing substantial resources to develop and maintain valid and cost-effective measures. The External Peer Review Program (EPRP) of the VA is the official data source for monitoring facility performance, used to prioritize the quality areas needing most attention. Facility performance measurement has significantly improved preventive and chronic care, as well as overall quality; however, much variability still exists in levels of performance across measures and facilities. Audit and feedback (A&F), an important component of effective performance measurement, can help reduce this variability and improve overall performance. Previous research suggests that VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) with high EPRP performance scores tend to use EPRP data as a feedback source. However, the manner in which EPRP data are used as a feedback source by individual providers as well as service line, facility, and network leadership is not well understood. An in-depth understanding of mental models, strategies, and specific feedback process characteristics adopted by high-performing facilities is thus urgently needed.This research compares how leaders of high, low, and moderately performing VAMCs use clinical performance data from the EPRP as a feedback tool to maintain and improve quality of care.
methodsWe will conduct a qualitative, grounded theory analysis of up to 64 interviews using a novel method of sampling primary care, facility, and Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) leadership at high-, moderate-, and low-performing facilities. We will analyze interviews for evidence of cross-facility differences in perceptions of performance data usefulness and strategies for disseminating performance data evaluating performance, with particular attention to timeliness, individualization, and punitiveness of feedback delivery. DISCUSSION: Most research examining feedback to improve provider and facility performance lacks a detailed understanding of the elements of effective feedback. This research will highlight the elements most commonly used at high-performing facilities and identify additional features of their successful feedback strategies not previously identified. Armed with this information, practices can implement more effective A&F interventions to improve quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.