ReviewExpert review of clinical immunology2012
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome: the past decade.
Review in Expert review of clinical immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study of Human Leukocyte Antigen Mismatched Cellular Therapy (Stem Cell Microtransplantation) in High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Transformed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.Stem cells translational medicine · 2016Trial
- Indications for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020Review
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for MDS: for whom, when and how?Blood reviews · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only therapy with curative potential for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Many conditioning regimens have been developed that, along with the use of cord blood or HLA-haploidentical donors, allow doctors to offer HCT to a growing proportion of patients. New classification schemes identify more narrowly characterized risk groups, which may facilitate decisions with regard to HCT. Disease stage and cytogenetics remain the major determinants of HCT outcome. The use of peripheral blood progenitor cells may offer an advantage over marrow for engraftment and relapse prevention, but graft-versus-host disease remains a problem. The age of patients undergoing HCT has increased significantly over the past 25 years, and comorbid conditions are the major patient characteristic impacting transplant success. Recent studies show that drugs used in the non-HCT setting may be beneficial in the context of HCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.