Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22606935›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2012

Genetic divergence and the genetic architecture of complex traits in chromosome substitution strains of mice.

Sabrina H Spiezio, Toyoyuki Takada, Toshihiko Shiroishi, Joseph H Nadeau

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deconstruction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dissecting the eQTL Micro-Architecture inFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genetic determinants of atherosclerosis, obesity, and energy balance in consomic mice.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Chromosome substitution strains: gene discovery, functional analysis, and systems studies.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina H SpiezioInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98019, USA.
Toyoyuki Takada
Toshihiko Shiroishi
Joseph H Nadeau
National Institute of Genetics · JPCase Western Reserve University · USInstitute for Systems Biology · US

Funding

MOUSE GENETIC RESOURCES FOR MULTIGENIC DISEASE ANALYSIS: AIDSP40RR012305 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BERGER, NATHAN A. · 1996 to 2011
$6.8M
NCRR NIH HHS RR12305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genetic architecture of complex traits strongly influences the consequences of inherited mutations, genetic engineering, environmental and genetic perturbations, and natural and artificial selection. But because most studies are under-powered, the picture of complex traits is often incomplete. Chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) are a unique paradigm for these genome surveys because they enable statistically independent, powerful tests for the phenotypic effects of each chromosome on a uniform inbred genetic background. A previous CSS survey in mice and rats revealed many complex trait genes (QTLs), large phenotypic effects, extensive epistasis, as well as systems properties such as strongly directional phenotypic changes and genetically-determined limits on the range of phenotypic variation. However, the unusually close genetic relation between the CSS progenitor strains in that study raised questions about the impact of genetic divergence: would greater divergence between progenitor strains, with the corresponding changes in gene regulation and protein function, lead to significantly more distinctive phenotypic features, or alternatively would epistasis and systems constraints, which are pervasive in CSSs, limit the range of phenotypic variation regardless of the extent of DNA sequence variation?

resultsWe analyzed results for an extensive survey of traits in two new panels of CSSs where the donor strains were derived from inbred strains with more distant origins and discovered a strong similarity in genetic and systems properties among the three CSS panels, regardless of divergence time.

conclusionOur results argue that DNA sequence differences between host and donor strains did not substantially affect the architecture of complex traits, and suggest instead that strong epistasis buffered the phenotypic effects of genetic divergence, thereby constraining the range of phenotypic variation.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, MammalianInheritance PatternsQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsCrosses, GeneticMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID22606935
PMCPMC3406986
OpenAlexW2158220573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.