Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22606256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

How linear tension converts to curvature: geometric control of bone tissue growth.

Cécile M Bidan, Krishna P Kommareddy, Monika Rumpler, Philip Kollmannsberger, Yves J M Bréchet, Peter Fratzl, John W C Dunlop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanical Cell Interactions on Curved Interfaces.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cécile M BidanDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany. Cecile.Bidan@mpikg.mpg.de
Krishna P Kommareddy
Monika Rumpler
Philip Kollmannsberger
Yves J M Bréchet
Peter Fratzl
John W C Dunlop
Max Planck Society · DELaboratoire des Matériaux et du Génie Physique · FRLudwig Boltzmann Institute of Osteology · ATMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how substrate geometry influences in-vitro tissue formation at length scales much larger than a single cell. Two-millimetre thick hydroxyapatite plates containing circular pores and semi-circular channels of 0.5 mm radius, mimicking osteons and hemi-osteons respectively, were incubated with MC3T3-E1 cells for 4 weeks. The amount and shape of the tissue formed in the pores, as measured using phase contrast microscopy, depended on the substrate geometry. It was further demonstrated, using a simple geometric model, that the observed curvature-controlled growth can be derived from the assembly of tensile elements on a curved substrate. These tensile elements are cells anchored on distant points of the curved surface, thus creating an actin "chord" by generating tension between the adhesion sites. Such a chord model was used to link the shape of the substrate to cell organisation and tissue patterning. In a pore with a circular cross-section, tissue growth increases the average curvature of the surface, whereas a semi-circular channel tends to be flattened out. Thereby, a single mechanism could describe new tissue growth in both cortical and trabecular bone after resorption due to remodelling. These similarities between in-vitro and in-vivo patterns suggest geometry as an important signal for bone remodelling.

Indexed as

Models, Biological3T3 CellsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone RemodelingBone SubstitutesDurapatiteMiceMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastOsteoblastsOsteogenesisSignal TransductionTensile StrengthTissue ScaffoldsBone SubstitutesDurapatite

Identifiers

PMID22606256
PMCPMC3350529
OpenAlexW2047997264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.