Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22605925›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2012

A tapetal-like fundus reflex in a healthy male: evidence against a role in the pathophysiology of retinal degeneration?

Patrik Schatz, Jesper Bregnhøj, Henrik Arvidsson, Dror Sharon, Liliana Mizrahi-Meissonnier, Birgit Sander, Karen Grønskov, Michael Larsen

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrik SchatzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. patrik.schatz@med.lu.se
Jesper Bregnhøj
Henrik Arvidsson
Dror Sharon
Liliana Mizrahi-Meissonnier
Birgit Sander
Karen Grønskov
Michael Larsen
Glostrup Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report on the retinal function and structure in a 37-year-old male who presented with a tapetal-like reflex (TLR) indistinguishable from that seen in female carriers of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).

methodsClinical examination included dark adaptometry, full-field electroretinography (ERG), multifocal ERG, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence photography. Molecular genetic testing included screening for known mutations in autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP) genes with a commercially available chip, and sequencing analysis of retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-open reading frame 15 (ORF15).

resultsFundus examination revealed a bilateral TLR, which is typical of female carriers of XLRP. Imaging studies and electrophysiological testing was unremarkable, except for a significant increase in full-field ERG amplitudes after prolonged dark adaptation as compared to after standard dark adaptation. Mutation screening was negative.

conclusionsTLR was found for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, in a male subject. There were no definitive signs of retinal degeneration, suggesting that this reflex in itself is not necessarily a precursor of the retinal degeneration that can be seen in female carriers of XLRP.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesReflexAdultDark AdaptationElectroretinographyEye ProteinsFemaleGenetic LinkageHeterozygoteHumansMalePedigreePhenotypeRetinaRetinitis PigmentosaSex FactorsEye ProteinsRPGR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22605925
PMCPMC3351408
OpenAlexW1786684296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.