Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22605405›Full record

SynthesisArthritis and rheumatism2012

Use of serum procalcitonin to detect bacterial infection in patients with autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiunn-Yih Wu, Si-Huei Lee, Chih-Jung Shen, Yueh-Che Hsieh, Ping-Hsiung Yo, Hsiang-Yun Cheng, Rai-Chi Chan, Chien-Chang Lee, Shy-Shin Chang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiunn-Yih WuChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Si-Huei Lee
Chih-Jung Shen
Yueh-Che Hsieh
Ping-Hsiung Yo
Hsiang-Yun Cheng
Rai-Chi Chan
Chien-Chang Lee
Shy-Shin Chang
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review evidence of the accuracy of the procalcitonin test for diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients with autoimmune disease.

methodsThe major databases Medline, EMBase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 1966 and October 2011 that evaluated procalcitonin, alone or in comparison with other laboratory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), as a diagnostic marker for bacterial infection in patients with autoimmune disease and provided sufficient data to permit construction of 2 × 2 tables.

resultsNine studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.88-0.93) for procalcitonin and 0.81 (95% CI 0.78-0.84) for CRP. In general, testing for procalcitonin was highly specific for identifying infectious complications, although it was not as sensitive as testing for CRP. Pooled sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.84) for procalcitonin tests and 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.85) for CRP tests. Pooled specificity was 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.93) for procalcitonin tests and 0.56 (95% CI 0.25-0.83) for CRP tests. The positive likelihood ratio for procalcitonin (7.28 [95% CI 5.10-10.38]) was sufficiently high to qualify procalcitonin testing as a rule-in diagnostic tool, while the negative likelihood ratio (0.28 [95% CI 0.18-0.40]) was not sufficiently low to qualify procalcitonin testing as a reliable rule-out diagnostic tool.

conclusionProcalcitonin has higher diagnostic value than CRP for the detection of bacterial sepsis in patients with autoimmune disease, and the test for procalcitonin is more specific than sensitive. A procalcitonin test is not recommended to be used in isolation as a rule-out tool.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesBacterial InfectionsCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHumansProtein PrecursorsSensitivity and SpecificityCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID22605405
OpenAlexW1999666590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.