Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22603793›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Alteration of χ recognition by RecBCD reveals a regulated molecular latch and suggests a channel-bypass mechanism for biological control.

Liang Yang, Naofumi Handa, Bian Liu, Mark S Dillingham, Dale B Wigley, Stephen C Kowalczykowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Homologous Recombination under the Single-Molecule Fluorescence Microscope.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. End resection at double-strand breaks: mechanism and regulation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. On the mechanism of recombination hotspot scanning during double-stranded DNA break resection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Molecular determinants responsible for recognition of the single-stranded DNA regulatory sequence, χ, by RecBCD enzyme.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liang YangDepartment of Microbiology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Naofumi Handa
Bian Liu
Mark S Dillingham
Dale B Wigley
Stephen C Kowalczykowski

Funding

Biochemical Mechanisms and Function of DNA HelicasesR01GM041347 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KOWALCZYKOWSKI, STEPHEN CHARLES · 1989 to 2018
$7.6M
Cancer Research UK 12799NIGMS NIH HHS GM41347NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041347Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RecBCD enzyme is a complex heterotrimeric helicase/nuclease that initiates recombination at double-stranded DNA breaks. In Escherichia coli, its activities are regulated by the octameric recombination hotspot, χ (5'-GCTGGTGG), which is read as a single-stranded DNA sequence while the enzyme is unwinding DNA at over ∼1,000 bp/s. Previous studies implicated the RecC subunit as the "χ-scanning element" in this process. Site-directed mutagenesis and phenotypic analyses identified residues in RecC responsible for χ recognition [Handa N, et al., (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 10.1073/pnas.1206076109]. The genetic analyses revealed two classes of mutants. Here we use ensemble and single-molecule criteria to biochemically establish that one class of mutants (type 1) has lost the capacity to recognize χ (lost-recognition), whereas the second class (type 2) has a lowered specificity for recognition (relaxed-specificity). The relaxed-specificity mutants still recognize canonical χ, but they have gained the capacity to precociously recognize single-nucleotide variants of χ. Based on the RecBCD structure, these mutant classes define an α-helix responsible for χ recognition that is allosterically coupled to a structural latch. When opened, we propose that the latch permits access to an alternative exit channel for the single-stranded DNA downstream of χ, thereby avoiding degradation by the nuclease domain. These findings provide a unique perspective into the mechanism by which recognition of a single-stranded DNA sequence switches the translocating RecBCD from a destructive nuclease to a constructive component of recombinational DNA repair.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularDNA RepairDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsExodeoxyribonuclease VMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein Structure, SecondaryRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSubstrate SpecificityDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli ProteinsExodeoxyribonuclease Vexodeoxyribonuclease V, E coli

Identifiers

PMID22603793
PMCPMC3384165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.