Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22596235›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2012

Value of DCE-MRI and FDG-PET/CT in the prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases.

S De Bruyne, N Van Damme, P Smeets, L Ferdinande, W Ceelen, J Mertens, C Van de Wiele, R Troisi, L Libbrecht, S Laurent and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05550090 (Clinical Study of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With IVIM-DWI for Early Prediction of Chemosensitivity in Liver Metastasis of Breast Cance), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05550090 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Study of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With IVIM-DWI for Early Prediction of Chemosensitivity in Liver Metastasis of Breast Cance

TypeobservationalSponsorZhejiang Cancer HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsMetastatic Breast Cancer in the LiverArmsChemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic significance of (18)FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Multimodality and temporal analysis of cervical cancer treatment response.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S De BruyneDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
N Van Damme
P Smeets
L Ferdinande
W Ceelen
J Mertens
C Van de Wiele
R Troisi
L Libbrecht
S Laurent
K Geboes
M Peeters
Ghent University Hospital · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for evaluation of response to chemotherapy and bevacizumab and for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with potentially resectable liver lesions.

methodsA total of 19 mCRC patients were treated with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI and bevacizumab followed by surgery. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT were performed before treatment and after cycle 5. PET results were quantified by calculating maximum standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) whereas area under the enhancement curve (AUC), initial AUC (iAUC) and the endothelial transfer constant (K(trans)) were used to quantify DCE-MRI. Pathological analysis of the resection specimen was performed, including measurement of microvessel density (MVD) and proliferation index.

resultsBoth AUC and iAUC were significantly decreased following bevacizumab therapy (median change of 22% (P=0.002) and 40% (P=0.001) for AUC and iAUC, respectively). Progression-free survival benefit was shown for patients with >40% reduction in K(trans) (P=0.019). In the group of radiological responders, the median baseline SUV(max) was 3.77 (IQR: 2.88-5.60) compared with 7.20 (IQR: 4.67-8.73) in nonresponders (P=0.021). A higher follow-up SUV(max) was correlated with worse PFS (P=0.012). Median MVD was 10.9. Progression-free survival was significantly shorter in patients with an MVD greater than 10, compared with patients with lower MVD (10 months compared with 16 months, P=0.016).

conclusionHigh relative decrease in K(trans), low follow-up SUV(max) and low MVD are favourable prognostic factors for mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab before surgery.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCamptothecinColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18FluorouracilHumansLeucovorinLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCamptothecinFluorodeoxyglucose F18FluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID22596235
PMCPMC3388560
OpenAlexW1963955463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.