Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22595244›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

New negative feedback regulators of Egfr signaling in Drosophila.

Jonathan P Butchar, Donna Cain, Sathiya N Manivannan, Andrea D McCue, Liana Bonanno, Sarah Halula, Sharon Truesdell, Christina L Austin, Thomas L Jacobsen, Amanda Simcox

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Role ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Functional Analysis of theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Temporal regulation of Dpp signaling output in the Drosophila wing.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Dpp-induced Egfr signaling triggers postembryonic wing development in Drosophila.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan P ButcharDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Donna Cain
Sathiya N Manivannan
Andrea D McCue
Liana Bonanno
Sarah Halula
Sharon Truesdell
Christina L Austin
Thomas L Jacobsen
Amanda Simcox
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly conserved epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) pathway is required in all animals for normal development and homeostasis; consequently, aberrant Egfr signaling is implicated in a number of diseases. Genetic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Egfr has contributed significantly to understanding this conserved pathway and led to the discovery of new components and targets. Here we used microarray analysis of third instar wing discs, in which Egfr signaling was perturbed, to identify new Egfr-responsive genes. Upregulated transcripts included five known targets, suggesting the approach was valid. We investigated the function of 29 previously uncharacterized genes, which had pronounced responses. The Egfr pathway is important for wing-vein patterning and using reverse genetic analysis we identified five genes that showed venation defects. Three of these genes are expressed in vein primordia and all showed transcriptional changes in response to altered Egfr activity consistent with being targets of the pathway. Genetic interactions with Egfr further linked two of the genes, Sulfated (Sulf1), an endosulfatase gene, and CG4096, an A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase with ThromboSpondin motifs (ADAMTS) gene, to the pathway. Sulf1 showed a strong genetic interaction with the neuregulin-like ligand vein (vn) and may influence binding of Vn to heparan-sulfated proteoglycans (HSPGs). How Drosophila Egfr activity is modulated by CG4096 is unknown, but interestingly vertebrate EGF ligands are regulated by a related ADAMTS protein. We suggest Sulf1 and CG4096 are negative feedback regulators of Egfr signaling that function in the extracellular space to influence ligand activity.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalSignal TransductionAnimalsBody PatterningDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEpistasis, GeneticErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenotypeLigandsPhenotypeProtein BindingRNA InterferenceDrosophila ProteinsErbB ReceptorsLigandsSULF1 protein, DrosophilaSulfatases

Identifiers

PMID22595244
PMCPMC3416002
OpenAlexW2049698392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.