Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22594943›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2012

Striatal dopamine modulates song spectral but not temporal features through D1 receptors.

Arthur Leblois, David J Perkel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Punishment-induced behavioral and neurophysiological variability reveals dopamine-dependent selection of kinematic movement parameters.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dopaminergic Contributions to Vocal Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arthur LebloisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. arthur.leblois@parisdescartes.fr
David J Perkel
Seattle University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W, STONE, JENNIFER S. · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
Synaptic processing in the basal gangliaR01MH066128 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PERKEL, DAVID J · 2003 to 2012
$2.6M
Modulation of auditory processing for vocal communicationR03DC009686 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEBLOIS, ARTHUR · 2009 to 2009
$47k
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC009686NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC009686NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066128NIMH NIH HHS R01MH066128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activity of midbrain dopaminergic neurons and their projection to the basal ganglia (BG) are thought to play a critical role in the acquisition of motor skills through reinforcement learning, as well as in the expression of learned motor behaviors. The precise role of BG dopamine (DA) in mediating and modulating motor performance and learning, however, remains unclear. In songbirds, a specialized portion of the BG is responsible for song learning and plasticity. Previously we found that DA acts on D1 receptors in Area X to modulate the BG output signal and thereby trigger changes in song variability. Here, we investigate the effect of D1 receptor blockade in the BG on song behavior in the zebra finch. We report that this manipulation abolishes social context-dependent changes in variability not only in harmonic stacks, but also in other types of syllables. However, song timing seems not to be modulated by this BG DA signal. Indeed, injections of a D1 antagonist in the BG altered neither song duration nor the change of song duration with social context. Finally, D1 receptor activation in the BG was not necessary for the modulation of other features of song, such as the number of introductory notes or motif repetitions. Together, our results suggest that activation of D1 receptors in the BG is necessary for the modulation of fine acoustic features of song with social context, while it is not involved in the regulation of song timing and structure at a larger time scale.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzazepinesConditioning, PsychologicalCorpus StriatumCourtshipDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsFinchesMaleReceptors, Dopamine D1Sound SpectrographyTime PerceptionVocalization, AnimalBenzazepinesDopamineReceptors, Dopamine D1SCH 23390

Identifiers

PMID22594943
PMCPMC3370102
OpenAlexW1922346787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.