Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22594880›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2012

HIV+ women's narratives of non-disclosure: resisting the label of immorality.

Allison Kjellman Groves, Suzanne Maman, Dhayendre Moodley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison Kjellman GrovesHealth Behavior and Health Education, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. grovesa@email.unc.edu
Suzanne Maman
Dhayendre Moodley
Department of Health · ZAUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

Efficacy of HIV Posttest Support for ANC in South AfricaR01HD050134 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAMAN, SUZANNE · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing partner disclosure rates among HIV+ individuals is widely seen as an important public health strategy to reduce HIV transmission. One approach for encouraging disclosure is to emphasise individuals' moral responsibility to disclose their status to their partners. We use South Africa as a case study to draw attention to two problems with labelling non-disclosure as immoral. First, we argue that because women are tested for HIV at much higher rates than men, any approach that involves blaming HIV+ individuals for not disclosing their status will disproportionately burden women. Second, through the narratives of six HIV+ women, we highlight how a focus on morality undervalues the complexity of sexual partnerships. Specifically, women describe how their perceived obligation to disclose their status is directly influenced by communication with their sexual partners. Women also discuss how the onset of different life events might alter the meaning of HIV and change obligations regarding disclosure within the partnership. The differences in testing rates across gender combined with the complexity of sexual partnerships leads us to suggest that labelling non-disclosure as immoral does little to advance HIV prevention. There is an urgent need to identify alternative interventions that support women through the disclosure process.

Indexed as

DisclosureAdultCommunicationFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansInterpersonal RelationsNarrationPrognosisSexual PartnersSouth AfricaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22594880
PMCPMC4083735
OpenAlexW2059453814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.