Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012
Safety and tolerability of an SQ-standardized GRAss ALlergy immunotherapy tablet (GRAZAX®) in a real-life setting for three consecutive seasons - the GRAAL trial.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01433510 (Observational National Clinical Trial of Safety and Tolerance in Patients Suffering of an Allergic Grass Pollen Rhinitis and Treated by Grazax in Real Life Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational National Clinical Trial of Safety and Tolerance in Patients Suffering of an Allergic Grass Pollen Rhinitis and Treated by Grazax in Real Life Settings
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- "The value of pre- and co-seasonal sublingual immunotherapy in pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis".Clinical and translational allergy · 2015Article
- Emerging therapies for food allergy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2014Review
- Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesGRAZAX(®) (Phleum Pratense, 75,000 SQ-T/2,800 BAU, ALK, Denmark), an SQ-standardized grass allergy sublingual immunotherapy tablet for the desensitization of grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis, has been developed to facilitate patient access to specific immunotherapy (SIT), while minimizing the risk of serious treatment-related adverse events. As a minimum duration of 3 years is recommended for SIT treatment, the GRAAL trial aimed to assess the safety profile of GRAZAX(®) in real-world conditions during long-term treatment of patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC).
methodsA multicentre, prospective, open-label, observational trial was conducted over three consecutive grass pollen seasons from November 2007 to October 2010 in France. A total of 130 physicians included 628 patients with previously documented ARC. Patients received one tablet daily (no up-titration) for at least 4 months before the expected start of the pollen season (pre-season), which was then maintained throughout the entire season (co-season). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability (immediate, i.e. each year at first tablet administration, and long-term) after pre- and co-seasonal exposure to GRAZAX(®).
resultsPatients were treated for an average of 5.5 months per year. After administration of the first tablet, immediate tolerable reactions (defined as benign, local, of short duration [<30 minutes] and not requiring any symptomatic treatment) were experienced by 54.6%, 38.4% and 33.6% of the patients during the first, second and third years of treatment, respectively. Immediate intolerable reactions (required study discontinuation, symptomatic medication or lasted >30 minutes) occurred in 14 patients (2.2%) during GRAZAX(®) initiation, and one patient (0.3%) at treatment reintroduction during the second year. Adverse events considered to be related to GRAZAX(®) were reported by 46.2%, 14.4% and 1.8% of patients, during the first, second and third years of treatment, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild-to-moderate local events (at the oral and pharyngeal mucosa levels). These symptoms mainly occurred within the first month of treatment initiation and subsequent tablet reintroduction.
conclusionDaily administration of GRAZAX(®) for three consecutive years was generally safe and well tolerated. An improvement in the incidence of adverse events related to treatment was observed at reintroduction of GRAZAX(®) and during the course of treatment.
trial registrationhttp://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01433510).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.