Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22594491›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012

Safety and tolerability of an SQ-standardized GRAss ALlergy immunotherapy tablet (GRAZAX®) in a real-life setting for three consecutive seasons - the GRAAL trial.

François Wessel, Antoine Chartier, Jean-Pierre Meunier, Antoine Magnan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01433510 (Observational National Clinical Trial of Safety and Tolerance in Patients Suffering of an Allergic Grass Pollen Rhinitis and Treated by Grazax in Real Life Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01433510 phase4completednot on this map

Observational National Clinical Trial of Safety and Tolerance in Patients Suffering of an Allergic Grass Pollen Rhinitis and Treated by Grazax in Real Life Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorALK-Abelló A/SRan2007 to 2010Enrolled628ConditionsAllergic RhinoconjunctivitisArmsGrazax
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emerging therapies for food allergy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

François WesselINSERM, U, Nantes, France.
Antoine Chartier
Jean-Pierre Meunier
Antoine Magnan
Inserm · FRInstitut du Thorax · FRUniversité Paris Nanterre · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGRAZAX(®) (Phleum Pratense, 75,000 SQ-T/2,800 BAU, ALK, Denmark), an SQ-standardized grass allergy sublingual immunotherapy tablet for the desensitization of grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis, has been developed to facilitate patient access to specific immunotherapy (SIT), while minimizing the risk of serious treatment-related adverse events. As a minimum duration of 3 years is recommended for SIT treatment, the GRAAL trial aimed to assess the safety profile of GRAZAX(®) in real-world conditions during long-term treatment of patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC).

methodsA multicentre, prospective, open-label, observational trial was conducted over three consecutive grass pollen seasons from November 2007 to October 2010 in France. A total of 130 physicians included 628 patients with previously documented ARC. Patients received one tablet daily (no up-titration) for at least 4 months before the expected start of the pollen season (pre-season), which was then maintained throughout the entire season (co-season). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability (immediate, i.e. each year at first tablet administration, and long-term) after pre- and co-seasonal exposure to GRAZAX(®).

resultsPatients were treated for an average of 5.5 months per year. After administration of the first tablet, immediate tolerable reactions (defined as benign, local, of short duration [<30 minutes] and not requiring any symptomatic treatment) were experienced by 54.6%, 38.4% and 33.6% of the patients during the first, second and third years of treatment, respectively. Immediate intolerable reactions (required study discontinuation, symptomatic medication or lasted >30 minutes) occurred in 14 patients (2.2%) during GRAZAX(®) initiation, and one patient (0.3%) at treatment reintroduction during the second year. Adverse events considered to be related to GRAZAX(®) were reported by 46.2%, 14.4% and 1.8% of patients, during the first, second and third years of treatment, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild-to-moderate local events (at the oral and pharyngeal mucosa levels). These symptoms mainly occurred within the first month of treatment initiation and subsequent tablet reintroduction.

conclusionDaily administration of GRAZAX(®) for three consecutive years was generally safe and well tolerated. An improvement in the incidence of adverse events related to treatment was observed at reintroduction of GRAZAX(®) and during the course of treatment.

trial registrationhttp://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01433510).

Indexed as

Administration, SublingualAdolescentAdultAgedAllergensChi-Square DistributionConjunctivitis, AllergicDesensitization, ImmunologicFemaleFranceHumansIntradermal TestsLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyAllergensGrazaxPlant ExtractsTablets

Identifiers

PMID22594491
OpenAlexW1981112907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.