Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22594378›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Comparison of low and high dose ionising radiation using topological analysis of gene coexpression networks.

Monika Ray, Reem Yunis, Xiucui Chen, David M Rocke

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monika RayDivision of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Reem Yunis
Xiucui Chen
David M Rocke
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
UC DAVIS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER: BPCAUL1RR024146 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$27.0M
Molecular mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches to combined radiation and bR33AI080604 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ISSEROFF, ROSLYN RIVKAH, ROCKE, DAVID M. · 2011 to 2013
$1.2M
Methods for Analysis of High Throughput Assay DataR01HG003352 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ROCKE, DAVID M. · 2006 to 2008
$658k
Molecular mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches to combined radiation and bR21AI080604 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ISSEROFF, ROSLYN RIVKAH, ROCKE, DAVID M. · 2008 to 2009
$426k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024146NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003352NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG003352NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI080604NIAID NIH HHS R21-AI080604NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI080604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing use of imaging procedures in medicine has raised concerns about exposure to low-dose ionising radiation (LDIR). While the disastrous effects of high dose ionising radiation (HDIR) is well documented, the detrimental effects of LDIR is not well understood and has been a topic of much debate. Since little is known about the effects of LDIR, various kinds of wet-lab and computational analyses are required to advance knowledge in this domain. In this paper we carry out an "upside-down pyramid" form of systems biology analysis of microarray data. We characterised the global genomic response following 10 cGy (low dose) and 100 cGy (high dose) doses of X-ray ionising radiation at four time points by analysing the topology of gene coexpression networks. This study includes a rich experimental design and state-of-the-art computational systems biology methods of analysis to study the differences in the transcriptional response of skin cells exposed to low and high doses of radiation.

resultsUsing this method we found important genes that have been linked to immune response, cell survival and apoptosis. Furthermore, we also were able to identify genes such as BRCA1, ABCA1, TNFRSF1B, MLLT11 that have been associated with various types of cancers. We were also able to detect many genes known to be associated with various medical conditions.

conclusionsOur method of applying network topological differences can aid in identifying the differences among similar (eg: radiation effect) yet very different biological conditions (eg: different dose and time) to generate testable hypotheses. This is the first study where a network level analysis was performed across two different radiation doses at various time points, thereby illustrating changes in the cellular response over time.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingRadiation, IonizingCell Culture TechniquesCell LineDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansKeratinocytesModels, BiologicalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProteinsRNAProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID22594378
PMCPMC3443446
OpenAlexW2009543033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.