ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2012
Bladder mucosal CO2 compared with gastric mucosal CO2 as a marker for low perfusion states in septic shock.
Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional capnometry to evaluate the adequacy of tissue perfusion.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent reports indicate the possible role of bladder CO(2) as a marker of low perfusion states. To test this hypothesis, shock was induced in six beagle dogs with 1 mg/kg of E. coli lipopolysaccharide, gastric CO(2) (CO(2)-G) was measured with a continuous monitor, and a pulmonary catheter was inserted in the bladder to measure CO(2) (CO(2)-B). Levels of CO(2)-B were found to be lower than those of CO(2)-G, with a mean difference of 36.8 mmHg (P < 0.001), and correlation between both measurements was poor (r(2) = 0.16). Even when the correlation between CO(2)-G and ΔCO(2)-G was narrow (r(2) = 0.86), this was not the case for the relationship between CO(2)-B and ΔCO(2)-B (r(2) = 0.29). Finally, the correlation between CO(2)-G and base deficit was good (r(2) = 0.45), which was not the case with the CO(2)-B correlation (r(2) = 0.03). In our experience, bladder CO(2) does not correlate to hemodynamic parameters and does not substitute gastric CO(2) for detection of low perfusion states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.