ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2007
An audit of singleton breech deliveries in a hospital with a high rate of vaginal delivery.
Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Birth outcomes of singleton term breech deliveries in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia.BMC research notes · 2019Article
- Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Observational
- Prevalence and Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Term Breech Delivery in Wolisso Hospital, Oromia Region, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of environmental and public health · 2017Article
- Delivery in breech presentation: the decision making.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The term breech trial (TBT) has brought about radical changes but it is debatable whether it provides unequivocal evidence regarding the practice of breech deliveries. There is a need to publish the data of a study that was performed before the era of the TBT in a hospital where there was a high rate of breech vaginal delivery. The objectives were to ascertain the incidence, mode of delivery and fetal outcome in singleton breech deliveries. The study design was a retrospective cohort study where 165 consecutive breech and 165 controls (cephalic) were included. Statistical analysis, used were Chi squared and Fischer's exact test. P<0.05 is taken as the level of significance. The incidence of breech deliveries was found to be 3% and has remained fairly constant but the rate of breech vaginal delivery has fallen and the CS rates have increased. Even though more breech compared to controls were significantly sectioned, majority of the breeches {n=137 (83%)} were planned for vaginal delivery and in these patients two-thirds attained vaginal delivery. There was 1 fetal death in the CS group compared to 12 deaths in the vaginally delivered breech. However, most death in the breech delivered vaginally are unavoidable. In conclusion, there is a high rate of breech vaginal delivery in this series of patients and most perinatal deaths were not related to the mode of delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22593649PMC3351215What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.