Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22593071›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Pre-cue fronto-occipital alpha phase and distributed cortical oscillations predict failures of cognitive control.

Jordan P Hamm, Kara A Dyckman, Jennifer E McDowell, Brett A Clementz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic network structure of interhemispheric coordination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alpha Oscillations Modulate Preparatory Activity in Marmoset Area 8Ad.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan P HammDepartments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Kara A Dyckman
Jennifer E McDowell
Brett A Clementz

Funding

Neural Noise and Cognitive Control in SchizophreniaR01MH094172 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CLEMENTZ, BRETT A · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Neural mechanisms for antisaccade errors among schizophrenia familiesR01MH085485 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CLEMENTZ, BRETT A · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
Neural circuitry plasticity resulting from saccadic practice in schizophreniaR03MH076998 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MCDOWELL, JENNIFER E · 2007 to 2008
$148k
Spatiotemporal dynamics of abnormal saccadic inhibition in schizophreniaF32MH082514 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DYCKMAN, KARA A · 2008 to 2009
$83k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH082514NIMH NIH HHS MH076998NIMH NIH HHS MH082514NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085485NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094172NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH076998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control is required for correct performance on antisaccade tasks, including the ability to inhibit an externally driven ocular motor response (a saccade to a peripheral stimulus) in favor of an internally driven ocular motor goal (a saccade directed away from a peripheral stimulus). Healthy humans occasionally produce errors during antisaccade tasks, but the mechanisms associated with such failures of cognitive control are uncertain. Most research on cognitive control failures focuses on poststimulus processing, although a growing body of literature highlights a role of intrinsic brain activity in perceptual and cognitive performance. The current investigation used dense array electroencephalography and distributed source analyses to examine brain oscillations across a wide frequency bandwidth in the period before antisaccade cue onset. Results highlight four important aspects of ongoing and preparatory brain activations that differentiate error from correct antisaccade trials: (1) ongoing oscillatory beta (20-30 Hz) power in anterior cingulate before trial initiation (lower for error trials); (2) instantaneous phase of ongoing alpha/theta (7 Hz) in frontal and occipital cortices immediately before trial initiation (opposite between trial types); (3) gamma power (35-60 Hz) in posterior parietal cortex 100 ms before cue onset (greater for error trials); and (4) phase locking of alpha (5-12 Hz) in parietal and occipital cortices immediately before cue onset (lower for error trials). These findings extend recently reported effects of pre-trial alpha phase on perception to cognitive control processes and help identify the cortical generators of such phase effects.

Indexed as

AdultAlpha RhythmBrain MappingBrain WavesCerebral CortexCognitionFemaleHumansPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSaccades

Identifiers

PMID22593071
PMCPMC3404822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.