Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22592675›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.

Mary J Renfrew, Felicia M McCormick, Angela Wade, Beverley Quinn, Therese Dowswell

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. BUNDLE OF MEASURES TO SUPPORT INTRAHOSPITAL EXCLUSIVE BREASTFEEDING: EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo
    Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary J RenfrewMother and Infant Research Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Felicia M McCormick
Angela Wade
Beverley Quinn
Therese Dowswell

Funding

Department of Health 10/106/01Department of Health 10/4001/02Department of Health HTA/10/106/01Department of Health SRP/10/4001/02Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended infants be exclusively breastfed until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet till at least two years of age. However, breastfeeding rates in many countries currently do not reflect this recommendation.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of support for breastfeeding mothers. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (3 October 2011). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsOf the 67 studies that we assessed as eligible for inclusion, 52 contributed outcome data to the review (56,451 mother-infant pairs) from 21 countries. All forms of extra support analysed together showed an increase in duration of 'any breastfeeding' (includes partial and exclusive breastfeeding) (risk ratio (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.96). All forms of extra support together also had a positive effect on duration of exclusive breastfeeding (RR at six months 0.86, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.91; RR at four to six weeks 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.89). Extra support by both lay and professionals had a positive impact on breastfeeding outcomes. Maternal satisfaction was poorly reported. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAll women should be offered support to breastfeed their babies to increase the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding. Support is likely to be more effective in settings with high initiation rates, so efforts to increase the uptake of breastfeeding should be in place. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Strategies that rely mainly on face-to-face support are more likely to succeed. Support that is only offered reactively, in which women are expected to initiate the contact, is unlikely to be effective; women should be offered ongoing visits on a scheduled basis so they can predict that support will be available. Support should be tailored to the needs of the setting and the population group.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingSocial SupportFemaleHealth EducationHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTerm Birth

Identifiers

PMID22592675
PMCPMC3966266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.