Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22592568›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2012

Engineering biomaterials to integrate and heal: the biocompatibility paradigm shifts.

James D Bryers, Cecilia M Giachelli, Buddy D Ratner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Understanding the properties of intermittent catheters to inform future development.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James D BryersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5061, USA. jbryers@uw.edu
Cecilia M Giachelli
Buddy D Ratner

Funding

Biomaterials that Prevent Biofilm Colonization and Device-based InfectionsR01EB007575 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRYERS, JAMES D. · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
Resolving Biomaterial Inflammatory Response by Controlling Macrophage PhenotypeR56AI084856 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRYERS, JAMES D. · 2010 to 2010
$416k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI084856NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article focuses on one of the major failure routes of implanted medical devices, the foreign body reaction (FBR)--that is, the phagocytic attack and encapsulation by the body of the so-called "biocompatible" biomaterials comprising the devices. We then review strategies currently under development that might lead to biomaterial constructs that will harmoniously heal and integrate into the body. We discuss in detail emerging strategies to inhibit the FBR by engineering biomaterials that elicit more biologically pertinent responses.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsBiocompatible MaterialsForeign-Body ReactionBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID22592568
PMCPMC3490630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.