Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22592447›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2013

Counseling nondaily smokers about secondhand smoke as a cessation message: a pilot randomized trial.

Rebecca E Schane, Judith J Prochaska, Stanton A Glantz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. From Stories to Action: How Framing, Perspective, and Identifiability in Personal Narratives Influence Vaccination Decisions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Tobacco use insights · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Real-World Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Strategies for Young and Older Adults: Findings From a Nationally Representative Cohort.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers of exposure to new and emerging tobacco delivery products.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Gender Differences in Smoking Behavior and Dependence Motives Among Daily and Nondaily Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca E SchaneCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA.
Judith J Prochaska
Stanton A Glantz
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlR25CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 2006 to 2015
$5.4M
Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Strategies for Inpatient PsychiatryR01MH083684 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PROCHASKA, JUDITH J. · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Education on the Dangers of Secondhand Smoke: New Treatment for Nondaily SmokersF32CA141930 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHANE, REBECCA EMILY · 2009 to 2009
$61k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA-141930NCI NIH HHS F32 CA141930NCI NIH HHS R25 CA-113710NCI NIH HHS R25 CA113710NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNondaily smoking represents a substantial and growing fraction of smokers, many of whom do not consider themselves smokers or at risk of tobacco-related diseases and, so, may be less responsive to counseling content contained in traditional cessation interventions. This study compares the effects brief counseling interventions (<20 min) focused on the harm smoking does to themselves (harm to self, HTS) versus the harm their secondhand smoke (SHS) does to others (harm to others, HTO) among nondaily smokers.

methodsRandomized trial of 52 nondaily smokers (smoked in the past week, but not daily) recruited between September 2009 and June 2010; 40 completed the study. We measured changes in motivation and smoking status at 3 months postintervention.

resultsThere was a difference in quitting between the two groups, with 9.5% (2 out of 21) for HTS and 36.8% (7 out of 19) for HTO subjects reporting not smoking any cigarettes in the prior week (p = .06 by Fisher exact test and .035 by likelihood-ratio chi-square). Motivation and self-efficacy increased from baseline to 3-month follow-up, but not differentially by intervention group.

conclusionsConsistent with findings from research conducted by the tobacco industry as early as the 1970s that concluded that social smokers feel immune from the personal health effects of tobacco but are concerned about the consequences of their SHS on others, educating nondaily smokers about the dangers of SHS to others appears to be a more powerful cessation message than traditional smoking cessation counseling that emphasizes the harmful consequences to the smoker.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationTobacco Smoke PollutionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSan FranciscoSmokingYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID22592447
PMCPMC3545714
OpenAlexW2031715717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.