Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22591609›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2012

Intracranial MEMS based temozolomide delivery in a 9L rat gliosarcoma model.

Byron C Masi, Betty M Tyler, Hansen Bow, Robert T Wicks, Yuan Xue, Henry Brem, Robert Langer, Michael J Cima

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. In vivo validation of a miniaturized electrochemical oxygen sensor for measuring intestinal oxygen tension.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nanotherapeutic systems for local treatment of brain tumors.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Single compartment drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Controlled Drug Delivery Using Microdevices.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Byron C MasiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Betty M Tyler
Hansen Bow
Robert T Wicks
Yuan Xue
Henry Brem
Robert Langer
Michael J Cima
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Microchip Drug Delivery SystemR01EB006365 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LANGER, ROBERT SAMUEL · 2007 to 2011
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NIBIB NIH HHS EB006365NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary malignant brain tumors (BT) are the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumor. Treatment of BTs is a daunting task with median survival just at 21 months. Methods of localized delivery have achieved success in treating BT by circumventing the blood brain barrier and achieving high concentrations of therapeutic within the tumor. The capabilities of localized delivery can be enhanced by utilizing mirco-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology to deliver drugs with precise temporal control over release kinetics. An intracranial MEMS based device was developed to deliver the clinically utilized chemotherapeutic temozolomide (TMZ) in a rodent glioma model. The device is a liquid crystalline polymer reservoir, capped by a MEMS microchip. The microchip contains three nitride membranes that can be independently ruptured at any point during or after implantation. The kinetics of TMZ release were validated and quantified in vitro. The safety of implanting the device intracranially was confirmed with preliminary in vivo studies. The impact of TMZ release kinetics was investigated by conducting in vivo studies that compared the effects of drug release rates and timing on animal survival. TMZ delivered from the device was effective at prolonging animal survival in a 9L rodent glioma model. Immunohistological analysis confirmed that TMZ was released in a viable, cytotoxic form. The results from the in vivo efficacy studies indicate that early, rapid delivery of TMZ from the device results in the most prolonged animal survival. The ability to actively control the rate and timing of drug(s) release holds tremendous potential for the treatment of BTs and related diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignFemaleGliosarcomaRatsRats, Inbred F344TemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID22591609
PMCPMC4404638
OpenAlexW2018473726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.