SynthesisPharmacoEconomics2012
Economic evaluation of smoking-cessation therapies: a critical and systematic review of simulation models.
Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Model-based economic evaluations in smoking cessation and their transferability to new contexts: a systematic review.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Unremarked or Unperformed? Systematic Review on Reporting of Validation Efforts of Health Economic Decision Models in Seasonal Influenza and Early Breast Cancer.PharmacoEconomics · 2016Pooled it
- Markov model- Quantifying outlook towards success of tobacco cessation counseling.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Review
- Article
- Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Interventions in People With Mental Disorders: A Dynamic Decision Analytical Model.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021Article
- Assessing the impact of smoking on the health and productivity of the working-age Indonesian population using modelling.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Cost-effectiveness of a high-intensity versus a low-intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dental setting: long-term follow-up.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Smoking Cessation: A Comparison of Two Model Structures.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Article
- Economic evaluation of a brief counselling for smoking cessation in dentistry: a case study comparing two health economic models.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Gender difference and effect of pharmacotherapy: findings from a smoking cessation service.BMC public health · 2016Article
- Smoking cessation treatment and outcomes patterns simulation: a new framework for evaluating the potential health and economic impact of smoking cessation interventions.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmoking is probably the most important among preventable health risks. Health economic evaluation of smoking-cessation interventions, applying a lifetime perspective, is made possible by available epidemiological knowledge. The well established method of performing cost-effectiveness analyses of smoking-cessation interventions involves mathematical modelling (both deterministic and stochastic) of future events important for cost effectiveness.
objectivesThis study surveys cost-effectiveness analyses of smoking cessation, with a particular focus on the mathematical modelling and simulation analyses performed. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed using the databases MEDLINE, Econlit and Academic Search Complete. STUDY SELECTION: Health economic evaluations, published as full-length journal articles, were searched for.
results423 studies were identified and 78 were finally included, of which 30 were assessed as being highly relevant, based on the application of simulation modelling.
conclusionsIn general, studies are well performed as regards modelling. Common weaknesses include reporting of modelling details; validation of used simulation models; and the handling of structural uncertainty and different types of heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22591112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.