Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22590682›Full record

ArticleViruses2012

Bacteriophages with the ability to degrade uropathogenic Escherichia coli biofilms.

Andrew Chibeu, Erika J Lingohr, Luke Masson, Amee Manges, Josée Harel, Hans-W Ackermann, Andrew M Kropinski, Patrick Boerlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Phage Cocktail againstInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Phage Therapy-Challenges, Opportunities and Future Prospects.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Antibiofilm activity of a lytic Salmonella phage on different Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from broiler farms.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. ClinicalMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Urinary Tract Infections Caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew ChibeuLaboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON N1G 3W4, Canada. erika.lingohr@phac-aspc.gc.ca
Erika J Lingohr
Luke Masson
Amee Manges
Josée Harel
Hans-W Ackermann
Andrew M Kropinski
Patrick Boerlin
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Guelph · CABiotechnology Research Institute · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections in humans. UTIs are usually managed with antibiotic therapy, but over the years, antibiotic-resistant strains of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) have emerged. The formation of biofilms further complicates the treatment of these infections by making them resistant to killing by the host immune system as well as by antibiotics. This has encouraged research into therapy using bacteriophages (phages) as a supplement or substitute for antibiotics. In this study we characterized 253 UPEC in terms of their biofilm-forming capabilities, serotype, and antimicrobial resistance. Three phages were then isolated (vB_EcoP_ACG-C91, vB_EcoM_ACG-C40 and vB_EcoS_ACG-M12) which were able to lyse 80.5% of a subset (42) of the UPEC strains able to form biofilms. Correlation was established between phage sensitivity and specific serotypes of the UPEC strains. The phages' genome sequences were determined and resulted in classification of vB_EcoP_ACG-C91 as a SP6likevirus, vB_EcoM_ACG-C40 as a T4likevirus and vB_EcoS_ACG-M12 as T1likevirus. We assessed the ability of the three phages to eradicate the established biofilm of one of the UPEC strains used in the study. All phages significantly reduced the biofilm within 2-12 h of incubation.

Indexed as

BacteriolysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsColiphagesDNA, ViralFemaleGenome, ViralGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNASerotypingUropathogenic Escherichia coliAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, ViralbacteriophagebiofilmsUPEC

Identifiers

PMID22590682
PMCPMC3347319
OpenAlexW2046373840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.