Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22590662›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2012

Malignant ascites: A review of prognostic factors, pathophysiology and therapeutic measures.

Suma L Sangisetty, Thomas J Miner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02638051 (Local Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia in Combination With Traditional Chinese Medicine Versus Intraperitoneal Chemoinfusion in Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis With Malignant Ascites), which is not on this map. Cited by 130 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02638051 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Local Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia in Combination With Traditional Chinese Medicine Versus Intraperitoneal Chemoinfusion in Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis With Malignant Ascites: A Phase II Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGalenic Research Institute LtdRan2014 to 2015Enrolled260ConditionsPeritoneal Neoplasms, Ascites, Yang Deficiency, Yin DeficiencyArmsModulated Electro-Hyperthermia (mEHT), TCM Herbal Decoction (Shi Pi), IPCI (CDDP+5FU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 282 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Determination of the optimal volume of ascitic fluid for the precise diagnosis of malignant ascites.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suma L SangisettySuma L Sangisetty, Thomas J Miner, Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
Thomas J Miner
Brown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant ascites indicates the presence of malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity and is a grave prognostic sign. While survival in this patient population is poor, averaging about 20 wk from time of diagnosis, quality of life can be improved through palliative procedures. Selecting the appropriate treatment modality remains a careful process, which should take into account potential risks and benefits and the life expectancy of the patient. Traditional therapies, including paracentesis, peritoneovenous shunt placement and diuretics, are successful and effective in varying degrees. After careful review of the patient's primary tumor origin, tumor biology, tumor stage, patient performance status and comorbidities, surgical debulking and intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be considered if the benefit of therapy outweighs the risk of operation because survival curves can be extended and palliation of symptomatic malignant ascites can be achieved in select patients. In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who do not qualify for surgical cytoreduction but suffer from the effects of malignant ascites, intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be safely and effectively administered via laparoscopic techniques. Short operative times, short hospital stays, low complication rates and ultimately symptomatic relief are the advantages of laparoscopically administering heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, making it not only a valuable treatment modality but also the most successful treatment modality for achieving palliative cure of malignant ascites.

Indexed as

CarcinomatosisHIPECParacentesisPeritonealPeritovenous shunts

Identifiers

PMID22590662
PMCPMC3351493
OpenAlexW2067651633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.