Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22589731›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Identification of genes that promote or antagonize somatic homolog pairing using a high-throughput FISH-based screen.

Eric F Joyce, Benjamin R Williams, Tiao Xie, C-Ting Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building Haplotype-Resolved 3D Genome Maps of Chicken Skeletal Muscle.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Genome control by SMC complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric F JoyceDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Benjamin R Williams
Tiao Xie
C-Ting Wu
Harvard University · US

Funding

New collections of dsRNAs and overexpression miRNA constructs to supplement RNAiR01GM067761 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2003 to 2019
$15.5M
A STUDY OF TRANSVECTION AT THE DROSOPHILA YELLOW GENER01GM061936 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2000 to 2003
$1.7M
Exploring the mechanism and function of somatic homolog pairingF32CA157188 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JOYCE, ERIC F. · 2011 to 2013
$155k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA157188NCI NIH HHS F32CA157188NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061936NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067761NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM61936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pairing of homologous chromosomes is a fundamental feature of the meiotic cell. In addition, a number of species exhibit homolog pairing in nonmeiotic, somatic cells as well, with evidence for its impact on both gene regulation and double-strand break (DSB) repair. An extreme example of somatic pairing can be observed in Drosophila melanogaster, where homologous chromosomes remain aligned throughout most of development. However, our understanding of the mechanism of somatic homolog pairing remains unclear, as only a few genes have been implicated in this process. In this study, we introduce a novel high-throughput fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technology that enabled us to conduct a genome-wide RNAi screen for factors involved in the robust somatic pairing observed in Drosophila. We identified both candidate "pairing promoting genes" and candidate "anti-pairing genes," providing evidence that pairing is a dynamic process that can be both enhanced and antagonized. Many of the genes found to be important for promoting pairing are highly enriched for functions associated with mitotic cell division, suggesting a genetic framework for a long-standing link between chromosome dynamics during mitosis and nuclear organization during interphase. In contrast, several of the candidate anti-pairing genes have known interphase functions associated with S-phase progression, DNA replication, and chromatin compaction, including several components of the condensin II complex. In combination with a variety of secondary assays, these results provide insights into the mechanism and dynamics of somatic pairing.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMeiosisRNA InterferenceAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAneuploidyAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome PairingCohesinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHeterochromatinIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHeterochromatinMicrotubule-Associated Proteinspav protein, DrosophilaUbiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes

Identifiers

PMID22589731
PMCPMC3349724
OpenAlexW2062660013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.