Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22589500›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2012

Effectiveness of dementia follow-up care by memory clinics or general practitioners: randomised controlled trial.

Els J Meeuwsen, René J F Melis, Geert C H M Van Der Aa, Gertie A M Golüke-Willemse, Benoit J M De Leest, Frank H J M Van Raak, Carla J M Schölzel-Dorenbos, Desiree C M Verheijen, Frans R J Verhey, Marieke C Visser and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00554047 (Effectiveness and Costs of Post-diagnosis Treatment in Dementia Coordinated by Multidisciplinary Memory Clinics in Comparison to Treatment Coordinated by General Practitioners), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00554047 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness and Costs of Post-diagnosis Treatment in Dementia Coordinated by Multidisciplinary Memory Clinics in Comparison to Treatment Coordinated by General Practitioners

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2007 to 2010Enrolled220ConditionsDementiaArmsMultidisciplinary Memory Clinic, General Practitioners
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of different post-diagnostic dementia care models delivered by primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Measuring the impact of informal elderly caregiving: a systematic review of tools.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Els J MeeuwsenDepartment of Geriatrics/Alzheimer Centre Nijmegen, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands. e.meeuwsen@ger.umcn.nl
René J F Melis
Geert C H M Van Der Aa
Gertie A M Golüke-Willemse
Benoit J M De Leest
Frank H J M Van Raak
Carla J M Schölzel-Dorenbos
Desiree C M Verheijen
Frans R J Verhey
Marieke C Visser
Claire A Wolfs
Eddy M M Adang
Marcel G M Olde Rikkert
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLElkerliek Ziekenhuis · NLGGZ Oost Brabant · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLSlingeland Ziekenhuis · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effectiveness of post-diagnosis dementia treatment and coordination of care by memory clinics compared with general practitioners.

designMulticentre randomised controlled trial.

settingNine memory clinics and 159 general practitioners in the Netherlands.

participants175 patients with a new diagnosis of mild to moderate dementia living in the community and their informal caregivers.

interventionsUsual care provided by memory clinic or general practitioner.

main outcome measuresCaregiver rated quality of life of the patient measured with the quality of life in Alzheimer's disease instrument and self perceived burden of the informal caregiver measured with the sense of competence questionnaire (intention to treat analysis).

resultsThe quality of life of the patients in the memory clinic group was 0.5 (95% confidence interval -0.7 to 1.6) points higher than in the general practitioner group. Caregivers' burden was 2.4 (-5.8 to 1.0) points lower in the memory clinic group than in the general practitioner group.

conclusionNo evidence was found that memory clinics were more effective than general practitioners with regard to post-diagnosis treatment and coordination care for patients with dementia. Without further evidence on the effectiveness of these modalities, other arguments, such as cost minimisation, patients' preferences, or regional health service planning, can determine which type of dementia care is offered.

trial registrationClinical trials NCT00554047.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareGeneral PracticeAgedAged, 80 and overCost of IllnessDementiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID22589500
PMCPMC3352696
OpenAlexW2037153696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.