Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22589297›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2012

Transfer times and outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: APEX-AMI insights.

Sean van Diepen, Petr Widimsky, Renato D Lopes, Kyle R White, W Douglas Weaver, Frans Van de Werf, Diego Ardissino, Arnoud W J van't Hof, Paul W Armstrong, Christopher B Granger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Sean van DiepenDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. sv9@ualberta.ca
Petr Widimsky
Renato D Lopes
Kyle R White
W Douglas Weaver
Frans Van de Werf
Diego Ardissino
Arnoud W J van't Hof
Paul W Armstrong
Christopher B Granger
University of Parma · ITCharles University · CZKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Integrated Biostatistical Training for CVD ResearchT32HL079896 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sean M O'Brien, Ana-Maria Staicu · 2006 to 2026
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL079896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransfer delays for primary percutaneous coronary intervention may increase mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. We examined the association between door 1-to-door 2 (D1D2) time, a measure capturing the entire transfer process, and outcomes in patients undergoing interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND

resultsWe evaluated the relationship between D1D2 time and the 90-day incidence of death, shock, and heart failure in the subset of 2075 (36.1%) of 5745 patients who underwent interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. There was no significant difference in the 90-day incidence of death, shock, and heart failure between the transferred and the nontransferred groups (10.3% versus 10.2%; P = 0.89). The median difference in symptom-to-balloon time between the 2 groups was 45 minutes (229 versus 184; P<0.001). The primary outcome per 30-minute delay was higher for patients with a D1D2 time ≤150 minutes (hazard ratio, 1.19: 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.33; P = 0.004) but not for D1D2 times >150 minutes (hazard ratio, 0.99: 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.02; P = 0.496). The association between longer D1D2 time and worsening outcome was no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment.

conclusionsLonger transfer times were associated with higher rate of death, shock, and heart failure among patients undergoing interhospital transfer from primary percutaneous coronary intervention, although this difference did not persist after adjusting for baseline characteristics.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth Services AccessibilityOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient TransferTime-to-TreatmentAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChi-Square DistributionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealth Services ResearchHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedpexelizumabSingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID22589297
PMCPMC3571720
OpenAlexW2169801015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.