ArticleClinical cardiology2012
Treatment and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome in the cancer population.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Prognostic Impact of Cancer in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Five-year retrospective analysis of invasiveCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review of Mechanisms and Management.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- The impact of acute coronary syndrome on long-term survival in cancer patients.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Chemotherapy-associated coronary thrombosis presenting as acute coronary syndrome in breast cancer: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Coronary artery disease and cancer: Shared risk factors, pathogenesis, and treatment effects.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Diagnosis, clinical management, and emerging strategies for coronary artery disease in patients with cancer.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Cancer.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Unraveling trends and disparities in acute myocardial infarction-related mortality among adult cancer patients: A nationwide CDC-WONDER analysis (1999-2020).International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes of patients with active cancer presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Arterial Thrombosis in Patients with Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Cancer and arterial thrombosis: therapeutic options.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- What to Do When There Is Something Unexpected?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cardiac Toxicities in Oncology: Elucidating the Dark Box in the Era of Precision Medicine.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Chest Pain in Cancer Patients: Prevalence of Myocardial Infarction and Performance of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponins.JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Article
- Vascular Inflammation, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Diseases.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Cancer and Myocardial Infarction in Women.The American journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Coronary artery disease, left ventricular function and cardiac biomarkers determine all-cause mortality in cancer patients-a large monocenter cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
- Malignant cancer may increase the risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective study of two large public databases.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRandomized trials have established the benefit of medical therapy and revascularization in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the 2 most common diseases worldwide. In clinical practice, cancer patients are frequently afflicted with MI. The benefit of medical and/or revascularization therapy in the cancer population with MI is less well known. HYPOTHESIS: Medical and revascularization therapy reduces mortality in cancer patients with MI.
methodsAfter approval by the institutional review board, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI who were admitted to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between December 2000 and October 2006 and evaluated the association between cardiac treatments with survival outcomes.
resultsA total of 456 patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI were identified and included in the study, of which 386 had non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) and 70 had ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Compared with patients with NSTEMI, patients who had STEMI were more often prescribed aspirin (66% vs 43%; P = 0.004), β-blockers (61% vs 46%; P = 0.018), and thrombolytic therapy (9% vs 0.3%; P = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, aspirin use was associated with a 23% decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.98, P = 0.033) and β-blocker use was associated with a 36% decreased risk of death (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81, P = 0.0002). Statins (HR: 0.82, P = 0.18) and catheter-based revascularization (HR: 0.57, P = 0.09) did not have an impact on the risk of death. Compared with patients with limited cancer, advanced cancer patients were twice as likely to die (HR: 2.12, 95 CI: 1.47-3.04, P < 0.0001). Previous chemotherapy (P = 0.005) and chest radiotherapy (P = 0.017) were associated with increased 1-year mortality, whereas hyperlipidemia (P = 0.018) was protective.
conclusionsIn this study of cancer patients with MI, medical therapy with aspirin and β-blockers was associated with improved survival. The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.