ReviewAnnals of Saudi medicine
The current lymphoma classification: new concepts and practical applications triumphs and woes.
Review in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Declining incidence and improving survival of ocular and orbital lymphomas in the US between 1995 and 2018.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advantage of urological experience with both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopy in lymph node biopsy for malignant lymphoma diagnosis.Investigative and clinical urology · 2016Article
- In vitro and in vivo activity of melflufen (J1)in lymphoma.BMC cancer · 2016Article
- Nucleic Acid Aptamers as Potential Therapeutic and Diagnostic Agents for Lymphoma.Journal of cancer therapy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphomas updated in 2008 represents an international consensus for diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms based on the recognition of distinct disease entities by applying a constellation of clinical and laboratory features. The 2008 classification has refined and clarified the definitions of well-recognized diseases, identified new entities and variants, and incorporated emerging concepts in the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms. Rather than being a theoretical scheme this classification has used data from published literature. Recent knowledge of molecular pathways has led to identification and development of new diagnostic tools, like gene expression profiling, which could complement existing technologies. However, some questions remain unresolved, such as the extent to which specific genetic or molecular alterations define certain tumors. In general, practical considerations and economics preclude a heavily molecular and genetic approach. The significance of early or precursor lesions and the identification of certain lymphoid neoplasms is less clear at present, but understanding is evolving. The borderline categories having overlapping features with large B-cell lymphomas, as well as some of the provisional entities, are subject to debate and lack consensus in management. Lastly, the sheer number of entities may be overwhelming, especially, for the diagnosing pathologist, who do not see enough of these on a regular basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.