Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22588288›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2013

Management of strabismus with hemianopic visual field defects.

Melanie van Waveren, Herbert Jägle, Dorothea Besch

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dichoptic visual field mapping of suppression in exotropia with homonymous hemianopia.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptation, perceptual learning, and plasticity of brain functions.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Non-compressive disorders of the chiasm.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie van WaverenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Herbert Jägle
Dorothea Besch
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemianopia and strabismus leads to severe disturbance of visual orientation and diplopia under binocular conditions if the deviated eye has a normal retinal localization. SUBJECTS AND

methodsFour cases with homonymous (two) and bitemporal (two) hemianopia and strabismus will be described with respect to binocular visual field and diplopia/confusion. All of them were recommended for strabismus surgery. Preoperatively, prism adaptation test was carried out to analyze functional results and fusional competence. In three of the four cases, strabismus surgery was successfully performed to avoid diplopia/confusion. All three patients revealed normal retinal correspondence. Furthermore, in two cases surgery led to an extension of binocular visual field; in one case with a bitemporal hemianopia and hemifield-slide phenomenon, blurred central vision and reading problems reduced significantly postoperatively. In one patient with anomalous retinal correspondence due to early childhood trauma exotropia led to an extension of the binocular visual field. In this case, strabismus surgery would have been unfavourable.

resultsCase 1 showed a homonymous hemianopia to the left and acquired exotropia of the right eye, leading to binocular diplopia. Case 2 with homonymous hemianopia to the right and exotropia of right eye revealed anomalous retinal correspondence after history of perinatal brain injury, resulting in absence of diplopia and enlargement of visual field to the right. Cases 3 and 4 with bitemporal hemianopia suffered from sensory disturbances caused by additional acquired strabismus. The exodeviation of the right eye in case 3 led to a restriction of binocular visual field with overlap of the nasal parts causing diplopia, whereas the esodeviation of case 4 resulted in a "gap" between the nasal parts (blind area).

conclusionDepending on the extent of visual field defects and on retinal correspondence, functional consequences for binocular vision and binocular visual field should be considered prior to surgery. In normal retinal correspondence, strabismus surgery will be indicated in most cases because of diplopia. However, surgery might result in a reduction of binocular visual field. Preoperatively, it is important to map monocular and binocular visual fields, to examine retinal correspondence, and to undertake prism adaptation test to imitate the postoperative functional result and risk of double vision.

Indexed as

AdultConfusionDiplopiaFemaleHemianopsiaHumansMaleOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresStrabismusVision, BinocularVisual AcuityVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID22588288
OpenAlexW1991235409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.